W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to
shape a better programmable document markup. See http://www.w3.org/ and - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ /Klaus _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
I wouldn't count on W3C anymore.
2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to > shape a better programmable document markup. > > See http://www.w3.org/ and > - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ > > /Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on her/his browser's script engine") - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/1997JulSep/0023.html I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by participants and not by users, that's for sure. /Klaus > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to >> shape a better programmable document markup. >> >> See http://www.w3.org/ and >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ >> >> /Klaus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Seaside mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: > > > I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. > > It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on her/his > browser's script engine") > > - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/1997JulSep/0023.html > > I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by > participants and not by users, that's for sure. Is XHTML 2 still the future? Is is dropped? Is it postponed? Do they have a schema now? I thought XForms is the future of forms as far as W3C is concerned. Is that dropped now too? Or only postponed? Will there be put more resources into the validator? http://www.whatwg.org/ <canvas> is already implemented by every browser that you can take serious. Philippe > /Klaus > > > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to > >> shape a better programmable document markup. > >> > >> See http://www.w3.org/ and > >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ > >> > >> /Klaus > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Seaside mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:27:40 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel: >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: >> >> > I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. >> >> It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on her/his >> browser's script engine") >> >> - >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/1997JulSep/0023.html >> >> I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by >> participants and not by users, that's for sure. > > Is XHTML 2 still the future? Is is dropped? Is it postponed? Do they > have a schema now? I thought XForms is the future of forms as far as > W3C is concerned. Is that dropped now too? Or only postponed? Will > there be put more resources into the validator? :) do you think that w.h.a.t.w.g. can branch away from W3? > http://www.whatwg.org/ > <canvas> is already implemented by every browser that you can take > serious. Will be interesting to see how the new W3.WG deals with broad community aspects... > Philippe > >> /Klaus >> >> > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: >> >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to >> >> shape a better programmable document markup. >> >> >> >> See http://www.w3.org/ and >> >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ >> >> >> >> /Klaus >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Seaside mailing list >> >> [hidden email] >> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Seaside mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Klaus D. Witzel
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/improve-your-forms-using-html5/
2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: > > > I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. > > It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on her/his > browser's script engine") > > - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/1997JulSep/0023.html > > I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by > participants and not by users, that's for sure. > > /Klaus > > > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to > >> shape a better programmable document markup. > >> > >> See http://www.w3.org/ and > >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ > >> > >> /Klaus > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Seaside mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Hey, autofocus came true! Philippe I owe you, at least a drink at the next
Stammtisch :) Okay, do I have to sign something (a petition?) to become official supporter of w.h.a.t.w.g. :) [damn, which customer did ask for that autofocus thing ages ago :| ] /Klaus On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:26:38 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: > http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/improve-your-forms-using-html5/ > > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: >> >> > I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. >> >> It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on her/his >> browser's script engine") >> >> - >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/1997JulSep/0023.html >> >> I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by >> participants and not by users, that's for sure. >> >> /Klaus >> >> > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: >> >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for Seasiders to >> >> shape a better programmable document markup. >> >> >> >> See http://www.w3.org/ and >> >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ >> >> >> >> /Klaus >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Seaside mailing list >> >> [hidden email] >> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Seaside mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Problem is, how soon do you realistically expect to be able to use it? 5
years? 10? :) -Boris -- +1.604.689.0322 DeepCove Labs Ltd. 4th floor 595 Howe Street Vancouver, Canada V6C 2T5 http://tinyurl.com/r7uw4 [hidden email] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email is intended only for the persons named in the message header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete the entire message including any attachments. Thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:seaside- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Klaus D. Witzel > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:58 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Seaside] Re: Re: W3C Launches New HTML Working Group > > Hey, autofocus came true! Philippe I owe you, at least a drink at the next > Stammtisch :) > > Okay, do I have to sign something (a petition?) to become official > supporter of w.h.a.t.w.g. :) > > [damn, which customer did ask for that autofocus thing ages ago :| ] > > /Klaus > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:26:38 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: > > > http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/improve-your-forms-using-html5/ > > > > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:05:15 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote: > >> > >> > I wouldn't count on W3C anymore. > >> > >> It's all people, look at an example (i.e. "everybody turn on > >> browser's script engine") > >> > >> - > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html- > editor/1997JulSep/0023.html > >> > >> I think the outcome of a new round on HTML/xhtml will be decided by > >> participants and not by users, that's for sure. > >> > >> /Klaus > >> > >> > 2007/3/10, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]>: > >> >> W3C rethinks HTML/xhtml and this is perhaps a chance for > to > >> >> shape a better programmable document markup. > >> >> > >> >> See http://www.w3.org/ and > >> >> - http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ > >> >> > >> >> /Klaus > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Seaside mailing list > >> >> [hidden email] > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Seaside mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |