Yeah, it is probably fine to JSON-serialize an URL as a string.
Lukas
On 24 September 2011 11:18, Philippe Marschall
<
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> WAUrl understands #javascriptOn: but not #jsonOn:. I have a case
> where I would need #jsonOn: with exactly the same semantics as
> #javascriptOn:. Would it make sense to add #jsonOn: to WAUrl or is
> that not such a good idea?
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev>
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
Locked
