Today the bug tracker: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list says 436 open out of 5437 issues. Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de |
congrats! :D
On 2012-03-06, at 14:08, Marcus Denker wrote: > > Today the bug tracker: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > > says 436 open out of 5437 issues. > > Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. > > With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates > to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > |
Great work!
Doru On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: > congrats! :D > > On 2012-03-06, at 14:08, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> Today the bug tracker: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list >> >> says 436 open out of 5437 issues. >> >> Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. >> >> With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates >> to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. >> >> Marcus >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow" |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
Wow, no idea why you should "Develop the development process!!!"... ;)
Good work and congrats! Chris Am 06.03.12 14:08, schrieb Marcus Denker: > > Today the bug tracker: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > > says 436 open out of 5437 issues. > > Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. > > With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates > to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de |
Keep going!
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Christoph Wysseier <[hidden email]> wrote: Wow, no idea why you should "Develop the development process!!!"... ;) Keep-Going-Forward.jpg (89K) Download Attachment |
Congratulations! Now, we should aim for a much smaller goal... Let's make Pharo so good that we'll average less than 1.00 bug fixed a day because Pharo's code will be sooooooooo gooooooooood, rock solid and stable ! ;) ----------------- Benoit St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero. (Albert Einstein) |
In reply to this post by vonbecmann
On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Benoit St-Jean wrote: > Congratulations! Now, we should aim for a much smaller goal... > > Let's make Pharo so good that we'll average less than 1.00 bug fixed a day because Pharo's code will be sooooooooo gooooooooood, rock solid and stable ! ;) > > Keep in mind that these are mostly improvements... We could freeze Pharo and only fix bugs. That would be easy. But is what we have already good enough for that? Do we have a future with Pharo if we only fix bugs? Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de |
"Good enough" is never a satisfactory answer indeed... Otherwise we'd all be still coding in COBOL! ----------------- Benoit St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero. (Albert Einstein)
|
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Benoit St-Jean wrote: > >> Congratulations! Now, we should aim for a much smaller goal... >> >> Let's make Pharo so good that we'll average less than 1.00 bug fixed a day because Pharo's code will be sooooooooo gooooooooood, rock solid and stable ! ;) >> >> > Keep in mind that these are mostly improvements... > > We could freeze Pharo and only fix bugs. That would be easy. > > But is what we have already good enough for that? Do we have a future with Pharo if we only fix bugs? > This was done for example for EToys. (Even though I think etoys could have been so much more... ) But this is a valid decision. Java is in the same camp. Backward-compatibility is the only benchmark, every move requires engineering capacity of staggering proportion, yet what you can do even with that is very limited (and far from fun for anyone involved). The decision is correct for the market and situation Java is in ("The new Cobol"), But would the same approach be good for Pharo? Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
Thanks Marcus for all what you do!
Noury On 6 mars 2012, at 14:08, Marcus Denker wrote: > > Today the bug tracker: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > > says 436 open out of 5437 issues. > > Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. > > With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates > to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > -- http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi http://www.kroobe.com/profile/noury |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
> Today the bug tracker: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > > says 436 open out of 5437 issues. > > Thise means we crossed the line of 5000 reports being closed today. We underestimate the amount of work we put in the system :) And this is great to have a way to get reminded that we should just continue. The future is bright :) Stef > > With the first report from damien.cassou, Jun 5, 2008, this translates > to 3.65 reports being taken care of *every* day. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > |
On 07 Mar 2012, at 11:52, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > We underestimate the amount of work we put in the system :) Yes. > And this is great to have a way to get reminded that we should just continue. Yes. > The future is bright :) Yes! ;-) Sven smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |