What is the plan with Pharo changes?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Seaside] Re: [Metacello] What is the plan with Pharo changes?

stephane ducasse
Hi Philippe

sounds quite good to me

>> Thanks for considering this a friendly and positive thread.
>
> So instead of lamenting the state of the world I went ahead and wrote
> some code. To find out what breaks in Seaside I created new packages
> for every Pharo package that didn't work. So I ended up with:
>
> - Grease-Pharo20-Core
> - Grease-Tests-Pharo20-Core
> - Seaside-Pharo20-Core
> - Seaside-Tests-Pharo20-Core
> - Javascript-Pharo20-Core
>
> You can find them in the Seaside 3.1 repository [1]. I'm not really
> sure this was a clever idea but it sounded better than writing a long
> mail.
>
> Things I ran into:
> - file system (obviously)
> - SystemAnnouncer
> - BlockContext is gone
        BlockContext has been abandoned some earth cycles ago already :)
> - extension methods are now present on String
> - different Float number printing
this is strange

> File system and SystemAnnouncer are only used by file library.
>
> Right now two tests fail because the GRPackage dependencies are
> inconsistent due to a mix of Pharo and Pharo20 packages. The rest
> seems to work, also functionally.

So this is a good news.

>
> Things I didn't test or even load:
> - OB tooling
> - Slime/SLint tooling
>
> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Seaside31
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>


12