Which Grease to use with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 and gsDevKit/tODE

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Which Grease to use with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 and gsDevKit/tODE

GLASS mailing list
Hi guys, 

When I try to load Seaside3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 I get a conflict because 'Grease' is locked in GemStone. See attached screenshot. I know how to fix it, but I don't know WHICH one of the 2 should be the correct one. On the one hand, if 'Grease' was locked out of the box by gsDevKit/tODE then I suspect that's the correct one. However, Seaside was bringing another version (#release1.1).

So my question is ... the locked version of Grease, should work correctly with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9? I guess it should since these instructions: https://github.com/GsDevKit/Seaside31
keep a #honor on the lock. 

Thanks, 

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Screen Shot 2015-10-14 at 11.19.43 AM.png (64K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Which Grease to use with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 and gsDevKit/tODE

GLASS mailing list
This is actually a "good" warning and proceeding is the correct action.

To get into specifics the conflict is occuring because the repository specified by Seaside (http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/SEaside/MetacelloConfigurations/main) is different that the locked repository (github://GsDevKit/Grease:master/repository) ... by honoring the lock (proceeding with Warning) the locked repository will continue to be used.

The GsDevKit/Grease repository is the master repository for GLASS/GsDevKit and should always be used, unless you clone it locally or fork your own ... in which case you will want to lock your own repo:)

Dale

On 10/14/2015 09:08 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck via Glass wrote:
Hi guys, 

When I try to load Seaside3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 I get a conflict because 'Grease' is locked in GemStone. See attached screenshot. I know how to fix it, but I don't know WHICH one of the 2 should be the correct one. On the one hand, if 'Grease' was locked out of the box by gsDevKit/tODE then I suspect that's the correct one. However, Seaside was bringing another version (#release1.1).

So my question is ... the locked version of Grease, should work correctly with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9? I guess it should since these instructions: https://github.com/GsDevKit/Seaside31
keep a #honor on the lock. 

Thanks, 


_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass


_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Which Grease to use with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 and gsDevKit/tODE

GLASS mailing list


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Dale Henrichs via Glass <[hidden email]> wrote:
This is actually a "good" warning and proceeding is the correct action.

To get into specifics the conflict is occuring because the repository specified by Seaside (http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/SEaside/MetacelloConfigurations/main) is different that the locked repository (github://GsDevKit/Grease:master/repository) ... by honoring the lock (proceeding with Warning) the locked repository will continue to be used.

The GsDevKit/Grease repository is the master repository for GLASS/GsDevKit and should always be used, unless you clone it locally or fork your own ... in which case you will want to lock your own repo:)


OK, so then I added:

onConflictUseIncoming: #('Seaside3') useLoaded: #('Grease');

Thanks!

 
Dale


On 10/14/2015 09:08 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck via Glass wrote:
Hi guys, 

When I try to load Seaside3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9 I get a conflict because 'Grease' is locked in GemStone. See attached screenshot. I know how to fix it, but I don't know WHICH one of the 2 should be the correct one. On the one hand, if 'Grease' was locked out of the box by gsDevKit/tODE then I suspect that's the correct one. However, Seaside was bringing another version (#release1.1).

So my question is ... the locked version of Grease, should work correctly with Seaside 3.1 in GemStone 3.2.9? I guess it should since these instructions: https://github.com/GsDevKit/Seaside31
keep a #honor on the lock. 

Thanks, 


_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass


_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass




--

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass