Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Seaside › Seaside Development

Which dialects don't support byte array literals?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Philippe Marschall

Which dialects don't support byte array literals?

Hi

Going over some file library code I was wondering, are there any
dialects that don't support byte array literals with the following
syntax:

#[1 2 3 4]

Cheers
Philippe
_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

John O'Keefe

Re: Which dialects don't support byte array literals?

VA Smalltalk, VisualWorks, and Dolphin support byte array literals.

John O'Keefe [|], Principal Smalltalk Architect, Instantiations Inc.
Skype: john_okeefe2 Mobile: +1 919 417-3181 (Business hours USA Eastern Time zone (GMT -5))
[hidden email]
http://www.instantiations.com
VA Smalltalk...Onward and Upward!

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

Going over some file library code I was wondering, are there any
dialects that don't support byte array literals with the following
syntax:

#[1 2 3 4]

Cheers
Philippe
_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

Paolo Bonzini-2

Re: Which dialects don't support byte array literals?

On 02/11/2011 02:54 PM, John O'Keefe wrote:
> VA Smalltalk, VisualWorks, and Dolphin support byte array literals.

So does GNU Smalltalk.

(The only doubts I had were about VW and Squeak).

Paolo
_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

Dale Henrichs

Re: Which dialects don't support byte array literals?

In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall

In GemStone2.4 byte array literals are _not_ supported, in GemStone3.0
byte array literals are supported.

Dale

On 02/10/2011 11:01 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:

> Hi
>
> Going over some file library code I was wondering, are there any
> dialects that don't support byte array literals with the following
> syntax:
>
> #[1 2 3 4]
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev

_______________________________________________
seaside-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev