Hey all!
Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of fixes in Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to use? And also, what is the 2.7b1? Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks! Brian _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Brian Brown wrote:
> Hey all! > > Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of fixes in > Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to > use? And also, what is the 2.7b1? > > Any guidance would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Brian To follow up with Brian's request: Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are planning on using GemStone/Seaside, I would think you probably should use 2.6. And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be best, like what is found on http://www.seaside.st That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would be the 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at: http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/ But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's opinions, also. Nevin _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
I imagine with built-in support for Monticello, GemStone should be able
to keep up-to-date with most recent versions of Seaside, just like Michel keeps VisualWorks ports fresh. Cheers! -Boris -- +1.604.689.0322 DeepCove Labs Ltd. 4th floor 595 Howe Street Vancouver, Canada V6C 2T5 http://tinyurl.com/r7uw4 [hidden email] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email is intended only for the persons named in the message header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete the entire message including any attachments. Thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:seaside- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nevin Pratt > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:11 AM > To: Seaside - general discussion > Subject: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :) > > Brian Brown wrote: > > Hey all! > > > > Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of fixes in > > Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to > > use? And also, what is the 2.7b1? > > > > Any guidance would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Brian > > To follow up with Brian's request: > > Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are planning on > GemStone/Seaside, I would think you probably should use 2.6. > > And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be best, like > what is found on http://www.seaside.st > > That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would be the > 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at: > > http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/ > > But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's opinions, > > Nevin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Nevin Pratt
Hi Nevin,
I don't like pre built images too much. I build my own every time I need customizing a stable release of a Squeak image with an installer script that loads exactly what I ask for. Currently I'm using 3.9 and Seaside 2.7a1-mb.205 well so far. cheers, Sebastian > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] En nombre > de Nevin Pratt > Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Mayo de 2007 14:11 > Para: Seaside - general discussion > Asunto: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :) > > Brian Brown wrote: > > Hey all! > > > > Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of > fixes in > > Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to > > use? And also, what is the 2.7b1? > > > > Any guidance would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Brian > > To follow up with Brian's request: > > Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are > planning on using GemStone/Seaside, I would think you > probably should use 2.6. > > And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be > best, like what is found on http://www.seaside.st > > That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would > be the 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at: > > http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/ > > But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's > opinions, also. > > Nevin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
One reason I tend to prefer pre-built images is under the assumption
that it would be one of the more stable versions (otherwise why
prebuild it?). For a real production site, stability is paramount.
Of course, this assumption is also based on the assumption that the person doing the prebuilding is very deeply involved in Squeak/Seaside, at least enough so that their opinions on how to build a stable Squeak/Seaside are reasonably good. Nevin Hi Nevin, I don't like pre built images too much. I build my own every time I need customizing a stable release of a Squeak image with an installer script that loads exactly what I ask for. Currently I'm using 3.9 and Seaside 2.7a1-mb.205 well so far. cheers, Sebastian-----Mensaje original----- De: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] En nombre de Nevin Pratt Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Mayo de 2007 14:11 Para: Seaside - general discussion Asunto: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :) Brian Brown wrote:Hey all! Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's offixes inMagritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to use? And also, what is the 2.7b1? Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks! BrianTo follow up with Brian's request: Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are planning on using GemStone/Seaside, I would think you probably should use 2.6. And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be best, like what is found on http://www.seaside.st That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would be the 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at: http://www.seaside.st/Download/Images/ But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's opinions, also. Nevin _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside_______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to
give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications already, so it can't be too bad. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Just remember to load Seaside 2.8 into a fresh image and don't upgrade
from an image with 2.7 in it. Cheers Philippe 2007/5/10, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>: > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > already, so it can't be too bad. > > Cheers, > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
I know I'd give it a whirl, but my life is in Michel's hands, so unless
he provides one for VisualWorks I can't be of much help. I'm using his latest 2.7 version and it's been great so far. -Boris -- +1.604.689.0322 DeepCove Labs Ltd. 4th floor 595 Howe Street Vancouver, Canada V6C 2T5 http://tinyurl.com/r7uw4 [hidden email] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email is intended only for the persons named in the message header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete the entire message including any attachments. Thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:seaside- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:24 AM > To: Seaside - general discussion > Subject: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :) > > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > already, so it can't be too bad. > > Cheers, > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Brian Brown-2
On 10 May 2007, at 18:55 , Brian Brown wrote: > And also, what is the 2.7b1? > This is just a milestone in the 2.7 version. It was done previously with 2.5 and 2.6, almost a tradition. I'm not sure but it may be some way to mark a version as stable. I created this milestone to mark the first VW version of 2.7. So to answer your question, 2.7b1 is the version to use. HTH Michel. _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Boris Popov, DeepCove Labs (SNN)
On 10 May 2007, at 21:14 , Boris Popov wrote: > I know I'd give it a whirl, but my life is in Michel's hands, I guess and hope this is a bit exagerated. > so unless he provides one for VisualWorks I can't be of much help. I will see what I can do, may be put 2.8 parcels somewhere as a preview. Seaside 2.8 might be breaking some of the add-ons that are on the public store. > I'm using his latest 2.7 version and it's been great so far. Thanks for the feedback Michel. _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
2007/5/10, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>:
> We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > already, so it can't be too bad. squeak-web-beta images are based on Seaside 2.8. However, it's a pretty old version of seaside. Can I upgrade to the last version? If yes, I'll create a new image. Bye -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
2007/5/13, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]>:
> 2007/5/10, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>: > > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > > already, so it can't be too bad. > > squeak-web-beta images are based on Seaside 2.8. However, it's a > pretty old version of seaside. Can I upgrade to the last version? If > yes, I'll create a new image. Yes but there are several things to keep in mind: - some things we will be broken. we have produtive applications running it so most things work but that doesn't mean that a particular feature you need will work, that's why we'd like people to have a look at it. - backtracking works differently, you have to implement #states (see examples) - if you want session cookies subclass WACookieSession - the old renderer is gone - several deprecated methods are gone - waframecomponent is gone Cheers Philippe > Bye > > -- > Damien Cassou > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Lukas Renggli wrote: > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > already, so it can't be too bad. > > Cheers, > Lukas > WaDateInput problem solved? If it works, I'll try 2.8 again. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGRvufQqspS1+XJHgRAsksAJ0UMZLRsvpKKSqKHipM69Gof4gGVgCeKyxh PTjk4pFmKIxc0Vx1Mpx9lVk= =bG3R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
2007/5/13, Sungjin Chun <[hidden email]>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lukas Renggli wrote: > > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > > already, so it can't be too bad. > > > > Cheers, > > Lukas > > > > WaDateInput problem solved? If it works, I'll try 2.8 again. Yes, Michel fixed it. Cheers Philippe > Thanks. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGRvufQqspS1+XJHgRAsksAJ0UMZLRsvpKKSqKHipM69Gof4gGVgCeKyxh > PTjk4pFmKIxc0Vx1Mpx9lVk= > =bG3R > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Damien Cassou-3
2007/5/13, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]>:
> 2007/5/10, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]>: > > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > > already, so it can't be too bad. > > squeak-web-beta images are based on Seaside 2.8. However, it's a > pretty old version of seaside. Can I upgrade to the last version? If > yes, I'll create a new image. Done. Download squeak-web-beta-123 from http://damien.cassou.free.fr/squeak-web/beta/ -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
If anyone feels for it, I created VW parcels from Seaside 2.8a1-lr.323.
They can be found at ftp://ftp.bany.fr/seaside/ The parcels must be manually loaded in the following sequence. SqueakBase SeasideBase SeasideForWebToolKit and/or SeasideForSwazoo Enjoy, Michel. On 10 May 2007, at 20:23 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > already, so it can't be too bad. > > Cheers, > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Seaside 2.8 in a nutshell:
- a lot of deprecated methods are gone, so get rig of them first - #states is used to backtrack objects instead of #registerObjectForBacktracking:, see implementers of #states for examples. We removed #registerObjectForBacktracking: this makes it easier to spot the places where you need to implement #states but impossible to write code that works on both 2.7 and 2.8. Maybe we could find a solution similar to the deprecation api that throws an exception only in development mode. We would be interested in your findings about memory usage, rendering times and callback times. Have fun! Cheers Philippe 2007/5/21, Michel Bany <[hidden email]>: > If anyone feels for it, I created VW parcels from Seaside 2.8a1-lr.323. > They can be found at ftp://ftp.bany.fr/seaside/ > The parcels must be manually loaded in the following sequence. > SqueakBase > SeasideBase > SeasideForWebToolKit and/or SeasideForSwazoo > Enjoy, > > Michel. > > > > On 10 May 2007, at 20:23 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > > > We would be grateful if people could also start using Seaside 2.8 to > > give feedback and to find and report bugs. I don't say it is stable > > yet, but I use it successfully for several productive applications > > already, so it can't be too bad. > > > > Cheers, > > Lukas > > > > -- > > Lukas Renggli > > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > > Seaside mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > > _______________________________________________ > Seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |