Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 6 messages Options
Pavel Krivanek-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

Pavel Krivanek-3
Hi,

In old FAMIX, the FAMIXAnnotationInstance defines two containers:
 - annotatedEntity
 - annotationType

The annotatedEntity is used for belongsTo, but I would like to know why annotationType was defined as container too. Does it has some reason?

Cheers,
-- Pavel

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Tudor Girba-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

In Java, you can call methods and reference to static variables from an AnnotationInstance.

Cheers,
Doru


> On Jul 31, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In old FAMIX, the FAMIXAnnotationInstance defines two containers:
>  - annotatedEntity
>  - annotationType
>
> The annotatedEntity is used for belongsTo, but I would like to know why annotationType was defined as container too. Does it has some reason?
>
> Cheers,
> -- Pavel
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.feenk.com

"Beauty is where we see it."





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Pavel Krivanek-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

Pavel Krivanek-3
well, but from that, I see no reason why annotationType should be a container. Is there some example when an annotation instance belongs to an annotation type (and does not belong to any other entity)?

-- Pavel

2018-07-31 16:00 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
Hi,

In Java, you can call methods and reference to static variables from an AnnotationInstance.

Cheers,
Doru


> On Jul 31, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In old FAMIX, the FAMIXAnnotationInstance defines two containers:
>  - annotatedEntity
>  - annotationType
>
> The annotatedEntity is used for belongsTo, but I would like to know why annotationType was defined as container too. Does it has some reason?
>
> Cheers,
> -- Pavel
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.feenk.com

"Beauty is where we see it."





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Tudor Girba-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

Actually, I am not sure what you are referring to.

AnnotationInstance is not a Container. It is a SourcedEntity.
AnnotationType is a Type.

Can you detail what does not work for you?

Cheers,
Doru



> On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:15 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> well, but from that, I see no reason why annotationType should be a container. Is there some example when an annotation instance belongs to an annotation type (and does not belong to any other entity)?
>
> -- Pavel
>
> 2018-07-31 16:00 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
> Hi,
>
> In Java, you can call methods and reference to static variables from an AnnotationInstance.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> > On Jul 31, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In old FAMIX, the FAMIXAnnotationInstance defines two containers:
> >  - annotatedEntity
> >  - annotationType
> >
> > The annotatedEntity is used for belongsTo, but I would like to know why annotationType was defined as container too. Does it has some reason?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -- Pavel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Beauty is where we see it."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.feenk.com

"Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
CyrilFerlicot
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

CyrilFerlicot
Le 31/07/2018 à 17:41, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> Hi,
>

Hi,

> Actually, I am not sure what you are referring to.
>
> AnnotationInstance is not a Container. It is a SourcedEntity.
> AnnotationType is a Type.
>
> Can you detail what does not work for you?
>

I think he is talking about the container pragma defining the
containment tree used by Moose Query to find
children/parents/scopes/dependencies.

> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>

--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment
Pavel Krivanek-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: Why AnnotationInstance type is container?

Pavel Krivanek-3


2018-07-31 18:19 GMT+02:00 Cyril Ferlicot D. <[hidden email]>:
Le 31/07/2018 à 17:41, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> Hi,
>

Hi,

> Actually, I am not sure what you are referring to.
>
> AnnotationInstance is not a Container. It is a SourcedEntity.
> AnnotationType is a Type.
>
> Can you detail what does not work for you?
>

I think he is talking about the container pragma defining the
containment tree used by Moose Query to find
children/parents/scopes/dependencies.

yes, about the relations properties
 

> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>


--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page