Quantcast

Why Aren't People Using Smalltalk?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Why Aren't People Using Smalltalk?

horrido
https://medium.com/@richardeng/why-aren-t-people-using-smalltalk-80de31b6e3f4

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Why Aren't People Using Smalltalk?

Eliot Miranda-2
Hi Richard,

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:

You're being inaccurate yourself :-)  You say "Smalltalk is a dynamic language that relies on a virtual machine interpreter. ", but it /doesn't/!  There is an Interpreter available and its slow.  But there are also lots of JIT VMs and these are not any where near as slow as Python interpreters.  So please can you come up with a more3 accurate less negative statement?

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Loading...