Why was and:and:and:and: deprecated?

I can't find a neat way to do the same thing. Am I missing something?

I personally don't like methods like the above as there are so many
combinations; you can just use the one argument version and nest the blocks

condition1 and: [ condition2 and: [ condition3 and: [ condition4 ] ] ] etc
> I can't find a neat way to do the same thing. Am I missing something?
>
>

Long long long time ago :)
And yes you can do it :)


> I can't find a neat way to do the same thing. Am I missing something?
>