Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it. Thank you -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
2010/9/28 Damien Cassou <[hidden email]>:
> Hi, > > does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described > objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it. There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
On 28.09.2010, at 21:02, Philippe Marschall wrote: > 2010/9/28 Damien Cassou <[hidden email]>: >> Hi, >> >> does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described >> objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it. > > There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP. Where is it? I'm interested because I created a Magritte-XML package that tries to deal with this. Norbert _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
2010/9/29 Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]>:
> > On 28.09.2010, at 21:02, Philippe Marschall wrote: > >> 2010/9/28 Damien Cassou <[hidden email]>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described >>> objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it. >> >> There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP. > > Where is it? Wherever you put it ;-) Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
On 29.09.2010, at 20:53, Philippe Marschall wrote: Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It can be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And right, it knows nothing about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite easy. Some can map the objects including relationships in a SOAP way (it's only plain nested objects). Then there is only the SOAP envelope missing. Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just don't like SOAP :) Norbert _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It > can be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And > right, it knows nothing about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite > easy. Some can map the objects including relationships in a SOAP way (it's > only plain nested objects). Then there is only the SOAP envelope missing. > Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just don't like SOAP > :) Thank you very much. In fact, I didn't want to do SOAP at all. It's just that Lukas told me about such a library that I could have a look at to help me create a Pier<->XML serializer. Looks like this library does not exist after all :-). -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
On 30.09.2010, at 15:10, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It >> can be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And >> right, it knows nothing about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite >> easy. Some can map the objects including relationships in a SOAP way (it's >> only plain nested objects). Then there is only the SOAP envelope missing. >> Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just don't like SOAP >> :) > > Thank you very much. In fact, I didn't want to do SOAP at all. It's > just that Lukas told me about such a library that I could have a look > at to help me create a Pier<->XML serializer. Looks like this library > does not exist after all :-). > Norbert _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |