Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
Locked
Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
 
|
Hi Guido,
Some time ago you were unable to access Monticello from inside your particular network situation. http://forum.world.st/Unable-to-use-Monticello-in-last-images-from-Jenkins-tt4653446.html We just were able to solve a similar case. http://forum.world.st/Problem-downloading-packages-with-Monticello-from-Smalltalkhub-because-of-setAcceptEncodingGzip-tt4677539.html Would it be possible to verify, first that your old problem still exists, and then try again with the following patch. SocketStream>>next: count "Read count elements and return them in a collection. If the receiver is #atEnd before count elements were read, return a smaller collection." ^ self nextInto: (self streamBuffer: count) That would be most helpful. Thx, Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill |
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
Guido is right now in Lille :P so you have to wait for a week.
From what I recall it was exactly that bug we had over in Argentina :) On 2013-03-23, at 11:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Guido, > > Some time ago you were unable to access Monticello from inside your particular network situation. > > http://forum.world.st/Unable-to-use-Monticello-in-last-images-from-Jenkins-tt4653446.html > > We just were able to solve a similar case. > > http://forum.world.st/Problem-downloading-packages-with-Monticello-from-Smalltalkhub-because-of-setAcceptEncodingGzip-tt4677539.html > > Would it be possible to verify, first that your old problem still exists, and then try again with the following patch. > > SocketStream>>next: count > "Read count elements and return them in a collection. > If the receiver is #atEnd before count elements were read, return a smaller collection." > > ^ self nextInto: (self streamBuffer: count) > > That would be most helpful. > > Thx, > > Sven > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > |
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
Aah, all this travelling around, it is a wonder you guys actually get any work done ;-)
Seriously, it is a good thing we're in contact and that he might be able to test. On 23 Mar 2013, at 11:21, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: > Guido is right now in Lille :P so you have to wait for a week. > From what I recall it was exactly that bug we had over in Argentina :) > > On 2013-03-23, at 11:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Guido, >> >> Some time ago you were unable to access Monticello from inside your particular network situation. >> >> http://forum.world.st/Unable-to-use-Monticello-in-last-images-from-Jenkins-tt4653446.html >> >> We just were able to solve a similar case. >> >> http://forum.world.st/Problem-downloading-packages-with-Monticello-from-Smalltalkhub-because-of-setAcceptEncodingGzip-tt4677539.html >> >> Would it be possible to verify, first that your old problem still exists, and then try again with the following patch. >> >> SocketStream>>next: count >> "Read count elements and return them in a collection. >> If the receiver is #atEnd before count elements were read, return a smaller collection." >> >> ^ self nextInto: (self streamBuffer: count) >> >> That would be most helpful. >> >> Thx, >> >> Sven >> >> -- >> Sven Van Caekenberghe >> http://stfx.eu >> Smalltalk is the Red Pill >> >> > > |
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
In reply to this post by Camillo Bruni-3
Yes, i'm sure this will do the fix. Nevertheless, as soon as i come back home i will send you the confirmation. Thanks
2013/3/23 Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> Guido is right now in Lille :P so you have to wait for a week. |
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
Sorry for the delay, but yes i confirm this solves my issue. What i see is that it is not yet integrated into 3.0 Cheers, Guido.
2013/3/23 Guido Chari <[hidden email]>
|
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
On 23 Apr 2013, at 19:18, Guido Chari <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay, but yes i confirm this solves my issue. Thanks, that is good to know ! > What i see is that it is not yet integrated into 3.0 Yeah, it is ready for inclusion, maybe I gave it the wrong status. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10102 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10102/SocketStream-next-should-not-signal-ConncetionClosed > Cheers, > Guido. > > > 2013/3/23 Guido Chari <[hidden email]> > Yes, i'm sure this will do the fix. Nevertheless, as soon as i come back home i will send you the confirmation. > > Thanks > > > 2013/3/23 Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> > Guido is right now in Lille :P so you have to wait for a week. > From what I recall it was exactly that bug we had over in Argentina :) > > On 2013-03-23, at 11:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Guido, > > > > Some time ago you were unable to access Monticello from inside your particular network situation. > > > > http://forum.world.st/Unable-to-use-Monticello-in-last-images-from-Jenkins-tt4653446.html > > > > We just were able to solve a similar case. > > > > http://forum.world.st/Problem-downloading-packages-with-Monticello-from-Smalltalkhub-because-of-setAcceptEncodingGzip-tt4677539.html > > > > Would it be possible to verify, first that your old problem still exists, and then try again with the following patch. > > > > SocketStream>>next: count > > "Read count elements and return them in a collection. > > If the receiver is #atEnd before count elements were read, return a smaller collection." > > > > ^ self nextInto: (self streamBuffer: count) > > > > That would be most helpful. > > > > Thx, > > > > Sven > > > > -- > > Sven Van Caekenberghe > > http://stfx.eu > > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > > > > > > > |
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
If a slice is proposed, you should "resolve" the case which flags the issue as Fix Review Needed
:) Ben On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Re: Your earlier problems accessing Monticello
|
|
OK, thx.
On 23 Apr 2013, at 19:42, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote: > If a slice is proposed, you should "resolve" the case which flags the issue as Fix Review Needed > > :) > > Ben > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> On 23 Apr 2013, at 19:18, Guido Chari <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry for the delay, but yes i confirm this solves my issue. >> >> Thanks, that is good to know ! >> >>> What i see is that it is not yet integrated into 3.0 >> >> Yeah, it is ready for inclusion, maybe I gave it the wrong status. >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10102 >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10102/SocketStream-next-should-not-signal-ConncetionClosed >> >>> Cheers, >>> Guido. >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/23 Guido Chari <[hidden email]> >>> Yes, i'm sure this will do the fix. Nevertheless, as soon as i come back home i will send you the confirmation. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/23 Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> >>> Guido is right now in Lille :P so you have to wait for a week. >>> From what I recall it was exactly that bug we had over in Argentina :) >>> >>> On 2013-03-23, at 11:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hi Guido, >>>> >>>> Some time ago you were unable to access Monticello from inside your particular network situation. >>>> >>>> http://forum.world.st/Unable-to-use-Monticello-in-last-images-from-Jenkins-tt4653446.html >>>> >>>> We just were able to solve a similar case. >>>> >>>> http://forum.world.st/Problem-downloading-packages-with-Monticello-from-Smalltalkhub-because-of-setAcceptEncodingGzip-tt4677539.html >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to verify, first that your old problem still exists, and then try again with the following patch. >>>> >>>> SocketStream>>next: count >>>> "Read count elements and return them in a collection. >>>> If the receiver is #atEnd before count elements were read, return a smaller collection." >>>> >>>> ^ self nextInto: (self streamBuffer: count) >>>> >>>> That would be most helpful. >>>> >>>> Thx, >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sven Van Caekenberghe >>>> http://stfx.eu >>>> Smalltalk is the Red Pill >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |