Your vm is too old….

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
16 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Your vm is too old….

NorbertHartl
As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?

Norbert
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Igor Stasenko
On 24 July 2013 17:13, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>
IIRC, it checking a VM build date.

> Norbert



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Stéphane Ducasse
In reply to this post by NorbertHartl

On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:

> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now

what is the problem?

> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>
> Norbert


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

NorbertHartl


Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:

>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>
> what is the problem?

I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.


>
>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>
>> Norbert
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Tudor Girba-2
Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.

Doru


On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>
>> what is the problem?
>
> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>
>
>>
>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>
>>> Norbert
>>
>>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Quality cannot be an afterthought."


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Igor Stasenko
On 24 July 2013 22:46, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>

Nope. Problem will be solved if we will know exactly what causing it,
write test with can reproduce it with 100% guarantee.

Using latest VM is not recipe from disease.
Unfortunately, we still don't have reproducible case and that blocks
us from fixing it.

> Doru
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

NorbertHartl
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Doru,

that's exactly what I did before.

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

NorbertHartl
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Doru,

I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.

thanks,

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Tudor Girba-2
This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.

That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.

Cheers,
Doru


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doru,

I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.

thanks,

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Stéphane Ducasse

On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:

This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.

That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.

Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system running without having to have a workaround at the image level.


Cheers,
Doru


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doru,

I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.

thanks,

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

NorbertHartl
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Do you know details of the problem. It is always good to now. 

Norbert

Am 25.07.2013 um 09:08 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.

That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.

Cheers,
Doru


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doru,

I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.

thanks,

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Tudor Girba-2
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM working. The details about the workaround are here:

I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well, but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?

Cheers,
Doru


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:

This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.

That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.

Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system running without having to have a workaround at the image level.


Cheers,
Doru


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
Doru,

I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.

thanks,

Norbert

Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:

> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>
>>> what is the problem?
>>
>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"




--

"Every thing has its own flow"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Igor Stasenko
On 25 July 2013 12:05, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM
> working. The details about the workaround are here:
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10395/
>
> I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well,
> but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?
>

Last time i discussed with Esteban about it, he said that he don't
knows where the problem in VM,
neither me.


> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban
>> fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are
>> using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.
>>
>> That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.
>>
>>
>> Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system
>> running without having to have a workaround at the image level.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Doru,
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest
>>> VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce
>>> the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work
>>> with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Norbert
>>>
>>> Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>> > Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>>> >
>>> > Doru
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse
>>> >> <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>> >>>
>>> >>> what is the problem?
>>> >>
>>> >> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using
>>> >> metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the
>>> >> configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it
>>> >>>> complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to
>>> >>>> complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Norbert
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > www.tudorgirba.com
>>> >
>>> > "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Guillermo Polito
Something I do not understand: "Latest stable" means latest or stable ? :). More specifically, How did you download it?

Because as far as I knew it was not fixed by Esteban in the VM... But maybe one of the latest merges with Eliot's branch fixed it...


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 25 July 2013 12:05, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM
> working. The details about the workaround are here:
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10395/
>
> I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well,
> but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?
>

Last time i discussed with Esteban about it, he said that he don't
knows where the problem in VM,
neither me.


> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban
>> fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are
>> using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.
>>
>> That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.
>>
>>
>> Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system
>> running without having to have a workaround at the image level.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Doru,
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest
>>> VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce
>>> the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work
>>> with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Norbert
>>>
>>> Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>> > Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>>> >
>>> > Doru
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse
>>> >> <[hidden email]>:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>> >>>
>>> >>> what is the problem?
>>> >>
>>> >> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using
>>> >> metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the
>>> >> configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it
>>> >>>> complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to
>>> >>>> complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Norbert
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > www.tudorgirba.com
>>> >
>>> > "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Tudor Girba-2
I meant stable, but given that I thought Norbert needs to update his local copy, I said "latest stable". Confusing :)

Doru


On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Something I do not understand: "Latest stable" means latest or stable ? :). More specifically, How did you download it?
>
> Because as far as I knew it was not fixed by Esteban in the VM... But maybe one of the latest merges with Eliot's branch fixed it...
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 12:05, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM
> > working. The details about the workaround are here:
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10395/
> >
> > I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well,
> > but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?
> >
>
> Last time i discussed with Esteban about it, he said that he don't
> knows where the problem in VM,
> neither me.
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban
> >> fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are
> >> using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.
> >>
> >> That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system
> >> running without having to have a workaround at the image level.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Doru
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Doru,
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest
> >>> VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce
> >>> the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work
> >>> with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Norbert
> >>>
> >>> Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
> >>>
> >>> > Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
> >>> >
> >>> > Doru
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse
> >>> >> <[hidden email]>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> what is the problem?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using
> >>> >> metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the
> >>> >> configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it
> >>> >>>> complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to
> >>> >>>> complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Norbert
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >>> >
> >>> > "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>
> >> "Every thing has its own flow"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "Every thing has its own flow"
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Things happen when they happen,
not when you talk about them happening."


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your vm is too old….

Tudor Girba-2
In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko
Oops. Sorry for creating confusions.

Doru


On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 25 July 2013 12:05, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM
>> working. The details about the workaround are here:
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10395/
>>
>> I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well,
>> but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?
>>
>
> Last time i discussed with Esteban about it, he said that he don't
> knows where the problem in VM,
> neither me.
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban
>>> fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are
>>> using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.
>>>
>>> That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system
>>> running without having to have a workaround at the image level.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Doru,
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest
>>>> VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot reproduce
>>>> the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll work
>>>> with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>> Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doru
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse
>>>>>> <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what is the problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using
>>>>>> metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate the
>>>>>> configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it
>>>>>>>> complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in order to
>>>>>>>> complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always sever?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."