> Hi Stef,
>
> with Nicolai, we considered it would be nice to have everything
> (groups and scoping) based on RBEnvironments...
for me groups are just a way to filter and is stable over time.
> And that we needed a way, for interactive use, to have 'live' or
> 'auto-updating' RBEnvironments (but maybe an environment used during a
> mass refactoring shouldn't be live however, to avoid recursion effects).
I would love that too :)
> Groups as kind of meta-packages... Interesting, as long as it doesn't
> uses the dependency mechanism of MC.
>
> Can we consider having also Ring objects to represent all this (group
> of packages, protocols)?
I do not know. I imagine that if we would have a remote browser then
ring objects would become more important.
>
> Thierry
>
> Le 22/03/2015 11:00, stepharo a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm analysing the behavior of groups in nautilus.
>>
>> - Add group works well.
>> This is really cool to be able to promote a package in the top focus
>> list.
>> The problem is that the group is not polymorph to a package so we
>> cannot publish.... but for now this should be ok.
>>
>> -2 Now
>> Add as Groups & Browse
>> does not work for me since it open a browser that only contains the
>> groups but the refresh ... does not work.
>> Then this is strange because after we can still find a class that
>> is not in the original package.
>>
>> - 3 Now
>> Add Matching ... could work if ask for a pattern and stop to browse
>> (cf above).
>>
>> - 4 Add in group does not propose the currently available groups (only
>> Work)
>>
>> - merge groups
>> -> raises a DNU
>>
>>
>> So I will remove 2 and implement 3
>>
>>
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15202>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Locked
