Smalltalk › Cincom › VisualWorks

about Smacc

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

stéphane ducasse-2

about Smacc

Hi

I would like to know if I'm correct that Smacc as shipped in 741 is
not in sync.
When I load it I get a warning telling me that the namespace
refactory changed....

Where can I find a version that is in sync with the distribution?
Does someone take care about that at cincom?

Stef

Giorgio Ferraris

WebToolkit JavaSTGMRenderer problems?

Hi,

it's correct that the loading of the WebToolkit parcel will write on the
transcript the following trace:

"JavaSTGMRenderer was not initialized properly because the javastgm.cla file
was not found in the renderer directory (a PortableFilename('.'))."

I'm using 7.4.1 on Windows XP sp 2.

Seems like some initialization is missing. Done something wrong? Or it's ok
to have this log?

Thanks for any info.

Giorgio Ferraris

Alan Knight-2

Re: WebToolkit JavaSTGMRenderer problems?

It's OK to have that. Basically it means that there's a piece of VisualWave infrastructure that's not there, and that the initialization code for VisualWave and WebToolkit has a lot of common code. The thing it's looking for is a Java class that can be used on the client to render certain kinds of Wave content. It's in $VISUALWORKS/wavedev/renderer. But for Web Toolkit usage (and even lots of VisualWave usage) it isn't needed.

At 05:58 PM 9/17/2006, Giorgio Ferraris wrote:

>Hi,
>
>it's correct that the loading of the WebToolkit parcel will write on the
>transcript the following trace:
>
>"JavaSTGMRenderer was not initialized properly because the javastgm.cla file
>was not found in the renderer directory (a PortableFilename('.'))."
>
>I'm using 7.4.1 on Windows XP sp 2.
>
>Seems like some initialization is missing. Done something wrong? Or it's ok
>to have this log?
>
>Thanks for any info.
>
>Giorgio Ferraris

--
Alan Knight [|], Cincom Smalltalk Development
[hidden email]
[hidden email]
http://www.cincom.com/smalltalk

"The Static Typing Philosophy: Make it fast. Make it right. Make it run." - Niall Ross

stéphane ducasse-2

Re: about Smacc

In reply to this post by stéphane ducasse-2

Tx john

Wh is in charge of the contributions at cincom?

> stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>> I would like to know if I'm correct that Smacc as shipped in 741
>> is not
>> in sync.
>> When I load it I get a warning telling me that the namespace
>> refactory
>> changed....
>
> The version with 7.4.1 (like the 7.4 version) doesn't work. You should
> use the version from
> http://www.refactory.com/Software/SmaCC/Download.html. You'll still
> get
> a warning about using the old "RB" parcels, but it should work.
>
> I don't know who created the version on the VW CD, but it is
> screwed up.
> For example, the SmaCCEdge>>hash method has the following source:
>
> hash
> ^(self to hash bitShift: 14) bitXor: transitionObjects hash
>
> However, the decompiled source is:
>
> hash
> ^(self to hash bitShift: 14) bitXor: characters hash
>
> "characters" is an undeclared reference.
>
>
> John Brant

kobetic

Re: about Smacc

stéphane ducasse wrote:
> Tx john
>
>
> Wh is in charge of the contributions at cincom?

In general, individual contributors are in charge. There's an FTP server
that only the contributors can upload to and that's where VW builder
gets the parcels from.

The situation with SmaCC is probably a bit unclear though. I suspect
there may not be anybody in charge of SmaCC on that server. I believe
that it was only one-time individual initiatives that got a particular
version of SmaCC in the builds. I'm not sure who got in the one shipping
with 7.4.1 or why is it different from the latest on the SmaCC web site.

I'll see if I can get the latest in for 7.5

Martin