Hi marcus/others
I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow if we start from 1.0 and press update. Thoughts? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi marcus/others > > I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates > because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow > if we start from 1.0 and press update. > Thoughts? > > Stef Is it really necessary? The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file... Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Yes I thought about that too.
Now I done it to remove strange compiled methods floating around. Stef On May 19, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Henrik Johansen wrote: > On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi marcus/others >> >> I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates >> because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow >> if we start from 1.0 and press update. >> Thoughts? >> >> Stef > Is it really necessary? > The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. > I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file... > > Cheers, > Henry > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On May 19, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Yes I thought about that too. > Now I done it to remove strange compiled methods floating around. > But that's done with #cleanUpForRelease.... it removes all changesets, then the CMs that are referenced by them are GCed. Marcus > Stef > > On May 19, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Henrik Johansen wrote: > >> On May 19, 2010, at 2:05 33PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi marcus/others >>> >>> I did a condenseChanges and I'm planning to issue a new image. I wanted to avoid to put it in the stream of updates >>> because since it takes a long time everybody can be penalized but at the same time we will not have the same flow >>> if we start from 1.0 and press update. >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Stef >> Is it really necessary? >> The difference in a zipped archive together with the image is a meager 1.2MB. >> I personally really don't mind the 5MB extra of spent diskspace for the uncondensed .changes file... >> >> Cheers, >> Henry >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |