> This is an aspect that I changed. An outcome is unexpected if and
> only if it
> does not match what is in the stored history. (For compatibility only
> #expectedFailures are added to the stored history.) So the preferred
> way to
> mark an outcome as unexpected is to store the history.
Ok, I understand now.
Could be okay. But how can I distinguish an expected failure from a
real failure ? At the first run, I get some failed tests. Are they
real or expected failures?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project