any chances issue 1788 may be included in 1.0?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

any chances issue 1788 may be included in 1.0?

EstebanLM
Hi,
Is there any changes we can include fix 1788 in 1.0? it is a serious
bug for those of us who uses SMTPClient :(
I can add it my self, but need an authorization :)

Cheers,
Esteban



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: any chances issue 1788 may be included in 1.0?

Adrian Lienhard
Yes, if this is important and not a big change we add it to 1.0. I updated issue #1788.

Cheers,
Adrian

On Feb 2, 2010, at 14:20 , Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

> Hi,
> Is there any changes we can include fix 1788 in 1.0? it is a serious
> bug for those of us who uses SMTPClient :(
> I can add it my self, but need an authorization :)
>
> Cheers,
> Esteban
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project