blueprint is broken :(

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

blueprint is broken :(

Tudor Girba
Hi,

With the recent changes in Mondrian it looks like the class blueprint  
is broken. The problem seems to be due to incorrect bounds of the  
parent node. I noticed when by spawning the blueprint of a hierarchy  
of classes, I got overlapping classes.

I will take a closer look, but it would be great if someone could  
confirm this problem. I guess it should happen with other nested  
visualizations.

Cheers,
Doru


--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: blueprint is broken :(

jannik laval
Hi Doru,
I confirm the problem.
I tried to use blueprint yesterday, without success.

Cheers,
Jannik

On Jun 25, 2010, at 00:20 , Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi,
>
> With the recent changes in Mondrian it looks like the class blueprint is broken. The problem seems to be due to incorrect bounds of the parent node. I noticed when by spawning the blueprint of a hierarchy of classes, I got overlapping classes.
>
> I will take a closer look, but it would be great if someone could confirm this problem. I guess it should happen with other nested visualizations.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

---
Jannik Laval


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: blueprint is broken :(

Alexandre Bergel
The problem is fixed. Version 481 contains a test that shows the problem and a fix for it.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On 25 Jun 2010, at 07:11, Laval Jannik wrote:

> Hi Doru,
> I confirm the problem.
> I tried to use blueprint yesterday, without success.
>
> Cheers,
> Jannik
>
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 00:20 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the recent changes in Mondrian it looks like the class blueprint is broken. The problem seems to be due to incorrect bounds of the parent node. I noticed when by spawning the blueprint of a hierarchy of classes, I got overlapping classes.
>>
>> I will take a closer look, but it would be great if someone could confirm this problem. I guess it should happen with other nested visualizations.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> ---
> Jannik Laval
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.






_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: blueprint is broken :(

Tudor Girba
Thanks, Alex.

It works.

Cheers,
Doru


On 26 Jun 2010, at 00:11, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> The problem is fixed. Version 481 contains a test that shows the  
> problem and a fix for it.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 25 Jun 2010, at 07:11, Laval Jannik wrote:
>
>> Hi Doru,
>> I confirm the problem.
>> I tried to use blueprint yesterday, without success.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jannik
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2010, at 00:20 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With the recent changes in Mondrian it looks like the class  
>>> blueprint is broken. The problem seems to be due to incorrect  
>>> bounds of the parent node. I noticed when by spawning the  
>>> blueprint of a hierarchy of classes, I got overlapping classes.
>>>
>>> I will take a closer look, but it would be great if someone could  
>>> confirm this problem. I guess it should happen with other nested  
>>> visualizations.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> ---
>> Jannik Laval
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"What we can governs what we wish."



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev