Hi,
how is WATask supposed to be used? There is an endless loop calling go on a task. How can I signal that this task is "finished"? I would have expected a self answer will do but it doesn't. thanks, Norbert _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> how is WATask supposed to be used? There is an endless
> loop calling go on a task. How can I signal that this > task is "finished"? I would have expected a self answer > will do but it doesn't. WATask answers what your method #go is returning, which is self if you don't specify anything else. However if there is nobody that calls the task, it is simply restarted. What would you expect otherwise? To get an empty component? Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 10:03 +0200, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> > how is WATask supposed to be used? There is an endless > > loop calling go on a task. How can I signal that this > > task is "finished"? I would have expected a self answer > > will do but it doesn't. > > WATask answers what your method #go is returning, which is self if you > don't specify anything else. However if there is nobody that calls the > task, it is simply restarted. > Ok, now I know that I have to do a call: on the task. This not how my logic works. It would expect the task to just return and the following statements set up new components to show. > What would you expect otherwise? To get an empty component? In general I would expect the task to end. I understand a task as "do these things and then you are finished so exit". The place where the task was could be nil then and it would displayed nothing (as long as this would work). In my case I just set up components in the background which will show automatically as soon as the task exits. Or I would expect to work like normal WAComponents. If I'm not wrong they render themselves as long as no answer is called. But if it is called they return. So this could also be true for a WATask. Norbert _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
> > WATask answers what your method #go is returning, which is self if you
> > don't specify anything else. However if there is nobody that calls the > > task, it is simply restarted. > > Ok, now I know that I have to do a call: on the task. This not how > my logic works. It would expect the task to just return and the > following statements set up new components to show. A task expects you to override #go and do a #call: somewhere in there. Otherwise a task doesn't make much sense. See the class comment. > > What would you expect otherwise? To get an empty component? > > In general I would expect the task to end. I understand a task as > "do these things and then you are finished so exit". The place > where the task was could be nil then and it would displayed nothing > (as long as this would work). In my case I just set up components > in the background which will show automatically as soon as the task > exits. That should be a last step of your task then. > Or I would expect to work like normal WAComponents. If I'm not wrong > they render themselves as long as no answer is called. A WATask also answers when the method #go ends. Lukass -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |