Hi,
I wanted to try new brick/bloc thing https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/future-new-widget-sets-is-coming-to-you/ however after loading (in Pharo 5.0) it is complaining about missing FILOStack (in BlBrickLayouter>>initialize) What should I load? Thanks, Peter |
I think this should do it: Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Bloc'; configurationOf: 'Bloc'; loadDevelopment. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 'Brick'; package: 'Brick-Core'; package: 'Brick-Scrollpane'; package: 'Brick-List'; load. ConfigurationOfTxText loadDevelopment. Cheers, Doru On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
> On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > FILOStack Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? |
Hi, Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :) Yes, better to use a queue - thanks! Cheers, On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Should work now, just update using Doru's script :) Cheers, Alex On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space? >> FILOStack > Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? > A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? queue is FIFO (first in, first out) FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom). Peter On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space? Because it's Bloc, a complete replacement for morphic - with its own spaces/managers/event fetcher and everything else. Also, it's complete vector based :) Alain Plantec will present it at ESUG, I suppose. Cheers, Alex |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Bloc is a ***real*** Morph new kernel. Now we are lucky because it
is powerful enough so that
we can render morphic morph inside itself. But Bloc has a new architecture rendering, event loop, and many more. Stef Le 1/6/15 08:09, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
> On 01 Jun 2015, at 08:09, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space? > > >> FILOStack > > > Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? > > A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? > > queue is FIFO (first in, first out) Right ;-) > FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom). Well, it was confusing ... > Peter > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Should work now, just update using Doru's script :) > > Cheers, > Alex > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :) > > Yes, better to use a queue - thanks! > > Cheers, > Alex > > On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > FILOStack > > Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? > A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? > > |
Maybe a FILOStack has lots of very thin layers? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filo)
Best wishes Peter Kenny -----Original Message----- From: Pharo-users [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sven Van Caekenberghe Sent: 01 June 2015 08:13 To: Any question about pharo is welcome Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] brick/bloc examples missing FILOStack > On 01 Jun 2015, at 08:09, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks, it seems to work now. I also had to switch to newly created "bloc" space. Why is that required? Why it wouldn't work also from "regular" Pharo space? > > >> FILOStack > > > Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? > > A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? > > queue is FIFO (first in, first out) Right ;-) > FILO technically should be the same as LIFO, only I have never heard someone say it in that order (since the top of the stack is the important bit, not the bottom). Well, it was confusing ... > Peter > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Should work now, just update using Doru's script :) > > Cheers, > Alex > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aliaksei Syrel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > Oops, this kind of stack is from moose and not in pharo :) > > Yes, better to use a queue - thanks! > > Cheers, > Alex > > On Jun 1, 2015 7:32 AM, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On 31 May 2015, at 23:15, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > FILOStack > > Just wondering, isn't this a contradiction in terms ? > A stack is by definition LIFO, a FILO structure is normally called a queue, no ? > > |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Doru
can you give me access to the repo of brick because I'm writing a configuration and a CI? Stef Le 1/6/15 07:28, Tudor Girba a écrit :
|
Both Brick and Bloc are in the Pharo repository. I think you have some rights there :) MCHttpRepository location: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Brick/main' user: '' password: '' Doru On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:08 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |