Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

broken tests

‹ Previous Topic Next Topic ›
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
 5 messages Options
Tudor Girba-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

broken tests

Tudor Girba-2
Hi Nicolas,

The newly introduced FAMIXDereferencedInvocation seems to be breaking the Moose tests.

Could you take a look?

Cheers,
Doru



--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Nicolas Anquetil
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: broken tests

Nicolas Anquetil
sure

I did forgot to run the test after introducing the new class.
sorry about that

nicolas

On 09/05/2016 22:31, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
>
> The newly introduced FAMIXDereferencedInvocation seems to be breaking the Moose tests.
>
> Could you take a look?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
Nicolas Anquetil
RMod team -- Inria Lille

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Tudor Girba-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: broken tests

Tudor Girba-2
No problem at all. It happens to everyone.

Cheers,
Doru


> On May 10, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> sure
>
> I did forgot to run the test after introducing the new class.
> sorry about that
>
> nicolas
>
> On 09/05/2016 22:31, Tudor Girba wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> The newly introduced FAMIXDereferencedInvocation seems to be breaking the Moose tests.
>>
>> Could you take a look?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Nicolas Anquetil
> RMod team -- Inria Lille
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Nicolas Anquetil
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: broken tests

Nicolas Anquetil

I corrected the problem, but did not understand it.

Correction is simply to introduce
---
to
     ^ super to

from
     ^ super from
---

in the new class

This is linked to FAMIXAssociation class>>toMethod looking for the
compiled method for #to
In this case #to is implemente din the super class (FAMIXInvocation) but
was not in the incriminated class.

There must be a better solution

nicolas


On 10/05/2016 20:23, Tudor Girba wrote:

> No problem at all. It happens to everyone.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> On May 10, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> sure
>>
>> I did forgot to run the test after introducing the new class.
>> sorry about that
>>
>> nicolas
>>
>> On 09/05/2016 22:31, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>
>>> The newly introduced FAMIXDereferencedInvocation seems to be breaking the Moose tests.
>>>
>>> Could you take a look?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>> www.feenk.com
>>>
>>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
>>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of reality."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>> --
>> Nicolas Anquetil
>> RMod team -- Inria Lille
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

--
Nicolas Anquetil
RMod team -- Inria Lille

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Blondeau Vincent
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: broken tests

Blondeau Vincent
Hi,

FAMIXAssociation class>>toMethod is looking in the current class and should do a lookup in superclasses.

I resolved this bug and removed the previous correction.

No more tests is failing: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1654/

Cheers,
Vincent

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [hidden email] [mailto:moose-dev-
> [hidden email]] De la part de Nicolas Anquetil
> Envoyé : mercredi 11 mai 2016 09:47
> À : Moose-related development
> Objet : [Moose-dev] Re: broken tests
>
>
> I corrected the problem, but did not understand it.
>
> Correction is simply to introduce
> ---
> to
>      ^ super to
>
> from
>      ^ super from
> ---
>
> in the new class
>
> This is linked to FAMIXAssociation class>>toMethod looking for the compiled
> method for #to In this case #to is implemente din the super class
> (FAMIXInvocation) but was not in the incriminated class.
>
> There must be a better solution
>
> nicolas
>
>
> On 10/05/2016 20:23, Tudor Girba wrote:
> > No problem at all. It happens to everyone.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> >> On May 10, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> sure
> >>
> >> I did forgot to run the test after introducing the new class.
> >> sorry about that
> >>
> >> nicolas
> >>
> >> On 09/05/2016 22:31, Tudor Girba wrote:
> >>> Hi Nicolas,
> >>>
> >>> The newly introduced FAMIXDereferencedInvocation seems to be breaking
> the Moose tests.
> >>>
> >>> Could you take a look?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Doru
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>> www.feenk.com
> >>>
> >>> "We can create beautiful models in a vacuum.
> >>> But, to get them effective we have to deal with the inconvenience of
> reality."
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Moose-dev mailing list
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> >> --
> >> Nicolas Anquetil
> >> RMod team -- Inria Lille
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> > www.feenk.com
> >
> > "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Nicolas Anquetil
> RMod team -- Inria Lille
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

!!!*************************************************************************************
"Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.!!!"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page