[bug] Better implementation of mutex in MethodDictionary

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[bug] Better implementation of mutex in MethodDictionary

MrGwen
Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/node/634
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/634

 Project:      GNU Smalltalk
 Version:      <none>
 Component:    VM
 Category:     bug reports
 Priority:     normal
 Assigned to:  Unassigned
 Reported by:  MrGwen
 Updated by:   MrGwen
 Status:       active

current implementation of MethodDictionary>>#mutex is not atomic,
so I propose a better implementation like Process>>#interruptLock
implementation



_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [bug] Better implementation of mutex in MethodDictionary

MrGwen
Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/634
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/634

 Project:      GNU Smalltalk
 Version:      <none>
 Component:    VM
 Category:     bug reports
 Priority:     normal
 Assigned to:  Unassigned
 Reported by:  MrGwen
 Updated by:   MrGwen
 Status:       active
 Attachment:   http://smalltalk.gnu.org/files/issues/mutex.patch (479 bytes)

With the patch it's better



_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk