bug looking for hunter

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

bug looking for hunter

stephane ducasse
Hi guys

I have to fix my house :) so I could not continue to kill this one on Unstable 11321

'-1199-01-05T20:33:14.321-05:00' asDateAndTime printString
        ->  '-1199-01-05T20:33:(14321/1000).321-05:00'

STef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

(Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds

Stéphane Ducasse
the problem seems to be due to
        (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds
        which returns a fraction


In pharo

Duration>>seconds
  "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."
 
  ^ (seconds rem: SecondsInMinute) + (nanos / NanosInSecond)


In Squeak>>seconds
        "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."

        ^seconds rem: SecondsInMinute


Now I have the impression that the squeak version is right

What do you think?

Stef


On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:

> Hi guys
>
> I have to fix my house :) so I could not continue to kill this one on Unstable 11321
>
> '-1199-01-05T20:33:14.321-05:00' asDateAndTime printString
> ->  '-1199-01-05T20:33:(14321/1000).321-05:00'
>
> STef
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds

Stéphane Ducasse
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2352

I proposed a fix and would loved to have feedback.

Stef

On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> the problem seems to be due to
> (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds
> which returns a fraction
>
>
> In pharo
>
> Duration>>seconds
> "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."
>
> ^ (seconds rem: SecondsInMinute) + (nanos / NanosInSecond)
>
>
> In Squeak>>seconds
> "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."
>
> ^seconds rem: SecondsInMinute
>
>
> Now I have the impression that the squeak version is right
>
> What do you think?
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I have to fix my house :) so I could not continue to kill this one on Unstable 11321
>>
>> '-1199-01-05T20:33:14.321-05:00' asDateAndTime printString
>> ->  '-1199-01-05T20:33:(14321/1000).321-05:00'
>>
>> STef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds

Alexandre Bergel
I commented on the website of google.

Alexandre


On 24 Apr 2010, at 13:59, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2352
>
> I proposed a fix and would loved to have feedback.
>
> Stef
>
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> the problem seems to be due to
>> (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds
>> which returns a fraction
>>
>>
>> In pharo
>>
>> Duration>>seconds
>> "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."
>>
>> ^ (seconds rem: SecondsInMinute) + (nanos / NanosInSecond)
>>
>>
>> In Squeak>>seconds
>> "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."
>>
>> ^seconds rem: SecondsInMinute
>>
>>
>> Now I have the impression that the squeak version is right
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I have to fix my house :) so I could not continue to kill this one  
>>> on Unstable 11321
>>>
>>> '-1199-01-05T20:33:14.321-05:00' asDateAndTime printString
>>> ->  '-1199-01-05T20:33:(14321/1000).321-05:00'
>>>
>>> STef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.






_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project