Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/node/179 Post a follow up: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/179 Project: GNU Smalltalk Version: <none> Component: Base classes Category: bug reports Priority: normal Assigned to: Unassigned Reported by: jeronimo Updated by: jeronimo Status: active Hello. I have some files that I created using the old syntax of GNU Smalltalk. With GNU Smalltalk 3.0.1, I can't easily edit those files anymore. The new command, smalltalk-bang, doesn't seem to work with files using the old syntax. A silly example: !Object methodsFor: 'stuff'! "Newton method for swuare roots -- this is the iterating part." newtonIterate: n | newValue | newValue := 0.5 * (n + (self / n)). ( (n - newValue) abs < 0.00000001 ) ifTrue: [ ^newValue ] ifFalse: [ "newValue printNl." ^self newtonIterate: newValue ] ! "Newton method for square roots." newton (self < 0) ifTrue: [ self error: 'Negative numbers have no square root!' ] ifFalse: [ ^self newtonIterate: self ] ! If you try hitting ! several times, you will notice that it will both produce the bang on the text and go, sometimes to the end of the method, and sometimes somewhere inside a string (if there is a ! inside the string). Thank you, J. PS: I assigned to component base classes because there is no "Emacs interactor" option... _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/179 Post a follow up: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/179 Project: GNU Smalltalk Version: <none> Component: Base classes Category: bug reports Priority: normal Assigned to: Unassigned Reported by: jeronimo Updated by: bonzinip -Status: active +Status: patch Attachment: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/files/issues/gst-179.patch (840 bytes) Just a thinko -- smalltalk-end-of-defun should not be executed if in old-syntax mode. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
In reply to this post by Jeronimo Pellegrini-5
Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/179 Post a follow up: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/179 Project: GNU Smalltalk Version: <none> Component: Base classes Category: bug reports Priority: normal Assigned to: Unassigned Reported by: jeronimo Updated by: bonzinip -Status: patch +Status: fixed committed to master and stable-3.0. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Hi Paolo!
I suppose it wasn't pushed yet, although I see other changes from yesterday in the repository. $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/smalltalk.git $ cd smalltalk $ git checkout master $ patch --dry-run -p1 </home/jeronimo/gst-179.patch patching file smalltalk-mode.el.in $ patch --dry-run -p1 </home/jeronimo/gst-180.patch patching file gst-mode.el.in $ git checkout stable-3.0 Switched to branch "stable-3.0" $ patch --dry-run -p1 </home/jeronimo/gst-179.patch patching file smalltalk-mode.el.in $ patch --dry-run -p1 </home/jeronimo/gst-180.patch patching file gst-mode.el.in $ Did I get the right repository or was it not pushed? J. On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:14:05AM -0700, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Issue status update for http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/179 > Post a follow up: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/179 > > Project: GNU Smalltalk > Version: <none> > Component: Base classes > Category: bug reports > Priority: normal > Assigned to: Unassigned > Reported by: jeronimo > Updated by: bonzinip > -Status: patch > +Status: fixed > > committed to master and stable-3.0. > > _______________________________________________ > help-smalltalk mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
> Did I get the right repository or was it not pushed? Pushed now. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:49:34AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Did I get the right repository or was it not pushed? > > Pushed now. > > Paolo Thanks for your nice work Paolo! J. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |