bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Frank Shearar-3
Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)

Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
receiving the occasional mail on these topics.

Here are our current mappings:
Any: KenCausey
Box-Admins: KenCausey
CI: FrankShearar
Documentation: casey
Games: asm
IRC: frankcag
Monticello: avi
News: gcorriga
Release Packaging: FrankShearar
SqueakMap: gokr
ToDo: RalphJohnson
Traits: dvf
www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg

I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).

I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
really ought to change owner.

Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.

The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)

frank

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Eliot Miranda-2
Hi Frank,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)

Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
receiving the occasional mail on these topics.

Here are our current mappings:
Any: KenCausey
Box-Admins: KenCausey
CI: FrankShearar
Documentation: casey
Games: asm
IRC: frankcag
Monticello: avi
News: gcorriga
Release Packaging: FrankShearar
SqueakMap: gokr
ToDo: RalphJohnson
Traits: dvf
www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg

I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
 

I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).

I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
really ought to change owner.

Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.

The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)

frank




--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

David T. Lewis
Hi Eliot,

I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
mailing lists.

Dave

> Hi Frank,
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>>
>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>>
>> Here are our current mappings:
>> Any: KenCausey
>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> CI: FrankShearar
>> Documentation: casey
>> Games: asm
>> IRC: frankcag
>> Monticello: avi
>> News: gcorriga
>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> Traits: dvf
>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>>
>
> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>
>
>>
>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>>
>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>> really ought to change owner.
>>
>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>>
>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Karl Ramberg
These are all the categories on bugs.squeak.org.
I'm not sure all have a default maintainer.
But it is a huge list of mostly dead projects


AST Aida Any Applescript BFAV BabySRE Balloon Balloon3D BitArray Box-Admins Browser Browser Booster CI Celeste Collections CommandShell Compiler Compression Connectors Cryptography DejaVu Fonts DictionaryBrowser Documentation Dr Geo DuoSystemBrowser Environments Etoys Exceptions ExternalWebBrowser FFI FileMan Files Folktale FractalMorph FreeType Plus GOODS Games Genie Glorp Graphics HTTPClient Hedgehog HelpSystem Hierarchy List Morph IRC IRCBot Installer Jabber Janitorial Jasmine Java Serialization Kabungu Kernel KernelImage KomHttpServer LanguageEditor LevelPlayingField Logic expressions MVC Magma Magritte Mantis MemoryUsage MinimalMorphic Monticello Morphic MorphicWrappers Movies Multilingual Mysql Driver Nebraska Network NewCompiler News Numerical Analysis ODBC OS-Acorn OS-Linux OS-Mac OS-Win32 OSProcess Obscure Bugs OmniBrowser OmniBrowser-Tools PackageInfo Pier PlusTools Polymorph PreferenceBrowser Prolog Refactoring Browser Release Packaging RemoteFrameBuffer Rio RoelTyper SARBuilder SARInstaller SPort ST80 SUnit SUnitGUI SVI Scamper Seaside Seaside AXAnnouncementsMenu Shout SmaCC SmallDEVS SmallWiki Sound Speech Squeak 64 bit Squeak-Dev SqueakMap SqueakSource StarBrowser Swazoo Swazoo-HTTP System TestBrowser ToDo ToolBuilder Tools Toothpick Traits TrueType Universes VBRegex VM Whisker Whisker++ WriteBarrier WxSqueak XML-Yaxo www.squeak.org any eCompletion

Karl

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:05 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Eliot,

I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
mailing lists.

Dave

> Hi Frank,
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>>
>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>>
>> Here are our current mappings:
>> Any: KenCausey
>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> CI: FrankShearar
>> Documentation: casey
>> Games: asm
>> IRC: frankcag
>> Monticello: avi
>> News: gcorriga
>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> Traits: dvf
>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>>
>
> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>
>
>>
>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>>
>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>> really ought to change owner.
>>
>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>>
>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot
>
>






Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Frank Shearar-3
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
> issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
> quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
> mailing lists.

My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already
have a VM category, and you are its default owner.

frank

> Dave
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>>>
>>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>>>
>>> Here are our current mappings:
>>> Any: KenCausey
>>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>>> CI: FrankShearar
>>> Documentation: casey
>>> Games: asm
>>> IRC: frankcag
>>> Monticello: avi
>>> News: gcorriga
>>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>>> SqueakMap: gokr
>>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>>> Traits: dvf
>>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>>>
>>
>> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>>>
>>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>>> really ought to change owner.
>>>
>>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>>>
>>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

fniephaus
Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as the owner.

Best,
Fabio

On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
> issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
> quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
> mailing lists.

My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already
have a VM category, and you are its default owner.

frank

> Dave
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>>>
>>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>>>
>>> Here are our current mappings:
>>> Any: KenCausey
>>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>>> CI: FrankShearar
>>> Documentation: casey
>>> Games: asm
>>> IRC: frankcag
>>> Monticello: avi
>>> News: gcorriga
>>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>>> SqueakMap: gokr
>>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>>> Traits: dvf
>>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>>>
>>
>> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>>>
>>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>>> really ought to change owner.
>>>
>>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>>>
>>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> best, Eliot
>>
>>
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Frank Shearar-3
Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if
you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you.

frank

On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as
> the owner.
>
> Best,
> Fabio
>
> On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Hi Eliot,
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
>> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
>> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
>> > mailing lists.
>>
>> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already
>> have a VM category, and you are its default owner.
>>
>> frank
>>
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >> Hi Frank,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar
>> >> <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>> >>>
>> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here are our current mappings:
>> >>> Any: KenCausey
>> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> >>> CI: FrankShearar
>> >>> Documentation: casey
>> >>> Games: asm
>> >>> IRC: frankcag
>> >>> Monticello: avi
>> >>> News: gcorriga
>> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> >>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> >>> Traits: dvf
>> >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>> >>> really ought to change owner.
>> >>>
>> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>> >>>
>> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>> >>>
>> >>> frank
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> >> best, Eliot
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

fniephaus
You're right! Just signed up: fniephaus

Best,
Fabio

On Tue 15 Sep 2015 at 06:23 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if
you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you.

frank

On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as
> the owner.
>
> Best,
> Fabio
>
> On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Hi Eliot,
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the
>> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is
>> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the
>> > mailing lists.
>>
>> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already
>> have a VM category, and you are its default owner.
>>
>> frank
>>
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >> Hi Frank,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar
>> >> <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)
>> >>>
>> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here are our current mappings:
>> >>> Any: KenCausey
>> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> >>> CI: FrankShearar
>> >>> Documentation: casey
>> >>> Games: asm
>> >>> IRC: frankcag
>> >>> Monticello: avi
>> >>> News: gcorriga
>> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> >>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> >>> Traits: dvf
>> >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else
>> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that
>> >>> really ought to change owner.
>> >>>
>> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!
>> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>> >>>
>> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost
>> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>> >>>
>> >>> frank
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> >> best, Eliot
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets

Frank Shearar-3
OK, you're now the default owner of the www.squeak.org category in the
Squeak project. (There is another project, "Squeak Website", but I
have no privileges there.)

frank

On 15 September 2015 at 12:41, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:

> You're right! Just signed up: fniephaus
>
> Best,
> Fabio
>
> On Tue 15 Sep 2015 at 06:23 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if
>> you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you.
>>
>> frank
>>
>> On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list
>> > me as
>> > the owner.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Fabio
>> >
>> > On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Eliot,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and
>> >> > the
>> >> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker
>> >> > is
>> >> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on
>> >> > the
>> >> > mailing lists.
>> >>
>> >> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already
>> >> have a VM category, and you are its default owner.
>> >>
>> >> frank
>> >>
>> >> > Dave
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi Frank,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar
>> >> >> <[hidden email]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
>> >> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a
>> >> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to
>> >> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the
>> >> >>> ticket.)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of
>> >> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Here are our current mappings:
>> >> >>> Any: KenCausey
>> >> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey
>> >> >>> CI: FrankShearar
>> >> >>> Documentation: casey
>> >> >>> Games: asm
>> >> >>> IRC: frankcag
>> >> >>> Monticello: avi
>> >> >>> News: gcorriga
>> >> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar
>> >> >>> SqueakMap: gokr
>> >> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson
>> >> >>> Traits: dvf
>> >> >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use
>> >> >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone
>> >> >>> else
>> >> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> really ought to change owner.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the
>> >> >>> bugs!
>> >> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will
>> >> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because
>> >> >>> almost
>> >> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> frank
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> _,,,^..^,,,_
>> >> >> best, Eliot
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>