bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
Locked
bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
 
|
Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various
subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.) Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of receiving the occasional mail on these topics. Here are our current mappings: Any: KenCausey Box-Admins: KenCausey CI: FrankShearar Documentation: casey Games: asm IRC: frankcag Monticello: avi News: gcorriga Release Packaging: FrankShearar SqueakMap: gokr ToDo: RalphJohnson Traits: dvf www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly). I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that really ought to change owner. Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs! It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox. The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :) frank |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
Hi Frank,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
Hi Eliot,
I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the mailing lists. Dave > Hi Frank, > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various >> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a >> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to >> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.) >> >> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of >> receiving the occasional mail on these topics. >> >> Here are our current mappings: >> Any: KenCausey >> Box-Admins: KenCausey >> CI: FrankShearar >> Documentation: casey >> Games: asm >> IRC: frankcag >> Monticello: avi >> News: gcorriga >> Release Packaging: FrankShearar >> SqueakMap: gokr >> ToDo: RalphJohnson >> Traits: dvf >> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg >> > > I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be. > > >> >> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use >> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly). >> >> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else >> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that >> really ought to change owner. >> >> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs! >> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will >> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox. >> >> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost >> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :) >> >> frank >> >> > > > -- > _,,,^..^,,,_ > best, Eliot > > |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
These are all the categories on bugs.squeak.org. I'm not sure all have a default maintainer. But it is a huge list of mostly dead projects Karl On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:05 PM, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Eliot, |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
In reply to this post by David T. Lewis
On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Eliot, > > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the > mailing lists. My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already have a VM category, and you are its default owner. frank > Dave > >> Hi Frank, >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.) >>> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics. >>> >>> Here are our current mappings: >>> Any: KenCausey >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey >>> CI: FrankShearar >>> Documentation: casey >>> Games: asm >>> IRC: frankcag >>> Monticello: avi >>> News: gcorriga >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar >>> SqueakMap: gokr >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson >>> Traits: dvf >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg >>> >> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be. >> >> >>> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly). >>> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that >>> really ought to change owner. >>> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs! >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox. >>> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :) >>> >>> frank >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> _,,,^..^,,,_ >> best, Eliot >> >> > > > |
|
Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as the owner. Best, Fabio On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if
you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you. frank On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote: > Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as > the owner. > > Best, > Fabio > > On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Hi Eliot, >> > >> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the >> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is >> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the >> > mailing lists. >> >> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already >> have a VM category, and you are its default owner. >> >> frank >> >> > Dave >> > >> >> Hi Frank, >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar >> >> <[hidden email]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various >> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a >> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to >> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.) >> >>> >> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of >> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics. >> >>> >> >>> Here are our current mappings: >> >>> Any: KenCausey >> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey >> >>> CI: FrankShearar >> >>> Documentation: casey >> >>> Games: asm >> >>> IRC: frankcag >> >>> Monticello: avi >> >>> News: gcorriga >> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar >> >>> SqueakMap: gokr >> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson >> >>> Traits: dvf >> >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg >> >>> >> >> >> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be. >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use >> >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly). >> >>> >> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else >> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that >> >>> really ought to change owner. >> >>> >> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs! >> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will >> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox. >> >>> >> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost >> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :) >> >>> >> >>> frank >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> _,,,^..^,,,_ >> >> best, Eliot >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > |
|
|
You're right! Just signed up: fniephaus Best, Fabio On Tue 15 Sep 2015 at 06:23 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if |
Re: bugs.squeak.org: default owners of tickets
|
|
OK, you're now the default owner of the www.squeak.org category in the
Squeak project. (There is another project, "Squeak Website", but I have no privileges there.) frank On 15 September 2015 at 12:41, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote: > You're right! Just signed up: fniephaus > > Best, > Fabio > > On Tue 15 Sep 2015 at 06:23 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Do you have an account on bugs.squeak.org? I don't think so, but if >> you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you. >> >> frank >> >> On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list >> > me as >> > the owner. >> > >> > Best, >> > Fabio >> > >> > On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Eliot, >> >> > >> >> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and >> >> > the >> >> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker >> >> > is >> >> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on >> >> > the >> >> > mailing lists. >> >> >> >> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already >> >> have a VM category, and you are its default owner. >> >> >> >> frank >> >> >> >> > Dave >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Frank, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar >> >> >> <[hidden email]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various >> >> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a >> >> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to >> >> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the >> >> >>> ticket.) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of >> >> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Here are our current mappings: >> >> >>> Any: KenCausey >> >> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey >> >> >>> CI: FrankShearar >> >> >>> Documentation: casey >> >> >>> Games: asm >> >> >>> IRC: frankcag >> >> >>> Monticello: avi >> >> >>> News: gcorriga >> >> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar >> >> >>> SqueakMap: gokr >> >> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson >> >> >>> Traits: dvf >> >> >>> www.squeak.org: KarlRamberg >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use >> >> >>> bugs.squeak.org very much (sadly). >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone >> >> >>> else >> >> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects >> >> >>> that >> >> >>> really ought to change owner. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the >> >> >>> bugs! >> >> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will >> >> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because >> >> >>> almost >> >> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> frank >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> _,,,^..^,,,_ >> >> >> best, Eliot >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > |
«
Return to Squeak - Dev
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |