Hi guys
It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we should integrate. Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to know for example when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is ready to go in 1.1. In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed). It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not tagged 1.0 and may be we should script the bugtracker. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
>
> Hi guys > > It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we > should integrate. > Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to > know for example > when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is ready > to go in 1.1. > > In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is > available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed). > It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be > integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after > we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not > tagged 1.0 and may be we should script > the bugtracker. I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's FasterSets code to Phare 1.1. If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and any hashedCollections code at the same time. I thus suggest that a final decision on FasterSets be made and get the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done on top of FasterSets rather than in parallel. Regards, Ralph Boland -- Volume * Density = Mass. Volume / Density = Intelligence. The latter equation explains the essentially equal intelligence of men and woman and the capabilities of some commonly used operating systems. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Ok I will let martin and andres
have a look because I'm not enough expert in that. On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Ralph Boland wrote: >> >> Hi guys >> >> It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we >> should integrate. >> Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to >> know for example >> when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is >> ready >> to go in 1.1. >> >> In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is >> available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed). >> It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be >> integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after >> we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not >> tagged 1.0 and may be we should script >> the bugtracker. > > I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's > FasterSets code to Phare 1.1. > If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and > any hashedCollections code at the same time. > I thus suggest that a final decision on FasterSets be made and get > the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done > on top of FasterSets rather than in parallel. > > Regards, > > Ralph Boland > > -- > Volume * Density = Mass. > Volume / Density = Intelligence. > The latter equation explains the > essentially equal intelligence of men and woman > and the capabilities of some commonly used operating systems. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |