Hello,
I have this code to solve the AOC 2018 day1 part1 challenge
|
The key question is "what do you mean by improve"? I'd start by asking "what are you doing that you will still have to do in part 2, and what won't you do?" So looking at part 2, you will want to convert the lines to integers, and input := Array streamContents: [:lines | 'input.txt' asFileReference readStreamDo: [:in | [in atEnd] whileFalse: [lines nextPut: in nextLine asInteger]]]. gives you a chunk of code you can use in both parts. So you might want to have Day1 changesFrom: aFileName ^Array streamContents: [:changes | aFileName asFileReference readStreamDo: [:in | [in atEnd] whileFalse: [changes nextPut: in nextLine asInteger]]] partOne: aFileName ^(self changesFrom: aFileName) sum partTwo: aFileName ... The file name should not be wired in because you want some test files. |
Thanks,
For the second I have to take a good look. I have to reread the file till the adding causes the same outcome as we had already so for example if we have the sequence : +3, +3, +4, -2, -4 RoelofOp 3-12-2018 om 03:45 schreef Richard O'Keefe:
|
In reply to this post by Richard O'Keefe
Also, given the time that some people solve the puzzle, doing it too nice is actually not the best use of time in AoC. Now, I'll try to solve quick and this will for sure lead to interesting things in Pharo. From Reddit, people solve it quick then make it nice. Phil On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 03:45 Richard O'Keefe <[hidden email] wrote:
|
Hello,
Im not going for a quick answer. For me its about practising and solving it and I do not matter to me how long it takes, I have finisched the MOOC and see this as a opportunity to practice with Pharo ( the syntax and the way things can be solved) Roelof Op 3-12-2018 om 08:00 schreef [hidden email]:
|
In reply to this post by Roelof
Roelof Wobben wrote "I have to reread the file till the adding causes the same outcome as we had already" You have to process the *sequence of changes* repeatedly; you DON't have to *reread the file*. Somebody already made this point. Having read the changes into an array, you can iterate repeatedly over that array. to find the first repeated frequency given a sequence of changes make an empty Set to hold the sums that have been seen so far. set the frequency to 0. loop forever for each change in the changes increment the frequency by the change. if the frequency is in the set return the frequency otherwise add the frequency to the set. partTwo: aFileName Transcript print: (self firstRepeatedFrequency: (self changesFrom: aFileName)); cr; flush. On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:31, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
hello Richard,
Thanks, I figured that out already. What I do not get is how to read the array multiple times. if I use do: this ends at the end of the array. Or I must use something as this : index := 0 if index > array length index =: 1 else index := index + 1 and then read the number with array at: index Roelof Op 3-12-2018 om 10:08 schreef Richard O'Keefe:
|
"if I use do: this ends at the end of the array." True. But all that means is that you have to keen on using #do:. Processing an array repeatedly is as simple as [true] whileTrue: [ anArray do: [:each | ...]] I had intended to twist this into [changes anySatisfy: [:change | ...]] whileFalse. However, in this case your second alternative has much to recommend it. The control flow is simple. There's no magic about it. It's an unusual setup, so no need to get fancy. seen := Set new. frequency := 0. found := false. i := changes size. [found] whileFalse: [ i := i = changes size ifTrue: [1] ifFalse: [i+1]. frequency := frequency + (changes at: i). found := seen includes: frequency. seen add: frequency]. I like this better than what I had. If we _were_ to get fancy, then introducing a CyclicReadStream class and doing seen := Set new. frequency := 0. found := false. stream := CyclicReadStream on: self changes. [found] whileFalse: [ frequency := frequency + stream next. found := seen includes: frequency. seen add: frequency]. wouldn't shrink the code much. Oddly enough, I've encountered problems in previous Advent of Code exercises where CyclicReadStream would have been handy. But just for this case? No. On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 00:25, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Thanks,
I found the function #atWrap who maybe can be handy Op 3-12-2018 om 13:17 schreef Richard O'Keefe:
|
In reply to this post by philippeback
Concerning Day1, part2 of Advent Of Code 2018, here's my quick take (Coded in a workspace with Squeak)... | file total numbers index frequencies duplicate | duplicate := false. frequencies := Set new: 150000. frequencies add: 0. numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. total := 0. file := StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'day.1.input'. [file atEnd] whileFalse: [numbers add: (Integer readFrom: file nextLine)]. file close. index := 0. [duplicate] whileFalse: [index := index \\ (numbers size) + 1. total := total + numbers at: index. (frequencies includes: total) ifTrue: [duplicate := true] ifFalse: [frequencies add: total]]. ^total ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 2:01:08 a.m. EST, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Also, given the time that some people solve the puzzle, doing it too nice is actually not the best use of time in AoC. Now, I'll try to solve quick and this will for sure lead to interesting things in Pharo. From Reddit, people solve it quick then make it nice. Phil On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 03:45 Richard O'Keefe <[hidden email] wrote:
|
Op 3-12-2018 om 15:30 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users:
Thanks, But at first glance you do not use the contents of file anywhere or am I mistaken. When I try your code on the real input I see a divide by zero error message. Roelof |
yep, on Pharo this is a empty collection.
numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. so index \\ (numbers size) is something divide by zero Roelof Op 3-12-2018 om 15:44 schreef Roelof Wobben: > Op 3-12-2018 om 15:30 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: > > Thanks, > > But at first glance you do not use the contents of file anywhere or am > I mistaken. > When I try your code on the real input I see a divide by zero error > message. > > Roelof > > > > |
Did you change the file name? ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 9:52:08 a.m. EST, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
yep, on Pharo this is a empty collection. numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. so index \\ (numbers size) is something divide by zero Roelof Op 3-12-2018 om 15:44 schreef Roelof Wobben: > Op 3-12-2018 om 15:30 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: > > Thanks, > > But at first glance you do not use the contents of file anywhere or am > I mistaken. > When I try your code on the real input I see a divide by zero error > message. > > Roelof > > > > |
Op 3-12-2018 om 16:08 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users:
yep I did change it by the argument partTwo: aFileName | total numbers index frequencies duplicate file | duplicate := false. frequencies := Set new: 150000. frequencies add: 0. numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. total := 0. file := self changesFrom: aFileName. index := 0. [duplicate] whileFalse: [index := index \\ (numbers size) + 1. total := total + numbers at: index. (frequencies includes: total) ifTrue: [duplicate := true] ifFalse: [frequencies add: total]]. ^total and changesFrom looks like this : changesFrom: aFileName ^Array streamContents: [:changes | aFileName asFileReference readStreamDo: [:in | [in atEnd] whileFalse: [changes nextPut: in nextLine asInteger]]] |
I'm on Squeak btw. Tried it in Pharo 6.1 and it looks like number parsing is different. Here's a version that works fine on Pharo 6.1 | file total numbers index frequencies duplicate | duplicate := false. frequencies := Set new: 150000. frequencies add: 0. numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. total := 0. file := StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'C:\Recv\day.1.input'. [file atEnd] whileFalse: [numbers add: (file nextLine asInteger)]. file close. index := 0. [duplicate] whileFalse: [index := index \\ (numbers size) + 1. total := total + numbers at: index. (frequencies includes: total) ifTrue: [duplicate := true] ifFalse: [frequencies add: total]]. total ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 10:12:36 a.m. EST, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
Op 3-12-2018 om 16:08 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: yep I did change it by the argument partTwo: aFileName | total numbers index frequencies duplicate file | duplicate := false. frequencies := Set new: 150000. frequencies add: 0. numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. total := 0. file := self changesFrom: aFileName. index := 0. [duplicate] whileFalse: [index := index \\ (numbers size) + 1. total := total + numbers at: index. (frequencies includes: total) ifTrue: [duplicate := true] ifFalse: [frequencies add: total]]. ^total and changesFrom looks like this : changesFrom: aFileName ^Array streamContents: [:changes | aFileName asFileReference readStreamDo: [:in | [in atEnd] whileFalse: [changes nextPut: in nextLine asInteger]]] |
Op 3-12-2018 om 16:13 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users:
> file := StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'C:\Recv\day.1.input'. > [file atEnd] whileFalse: [numbers add: (file nextLine asInteger)]. > file close. very wierd, on my Pharo 7 box I do not work. I also see a message that temp variables are not written or read Can you try your code on my input : https://gist.github.com/RoelofWobben/001a0d7f9a8d5b5a0ebbc3f133dbd032 and tell me the outcome. I have solved it already so you do not spoil anything Roelof |
In reply to this post by Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list
found it.
I use the old reading code from part1. but on part2 you did add the input to the numbers collection so numbers was keeping empty sorry for the noise Roelof Op 3-12-2018 om 16:13 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: > | file total numbers index frequencies duplicate | > > duplicate := false. > frequencies := Set new: 150000. > frequencies add: 0. > numbers := OrderedCollection new: 1000. > total := 0. > > file := StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'C:\Recv\day.1.input'. > [file atEnd] whileFalse: [numbers add: (file nextLine asInteger)]. > file close. > > index := 0. > [duplicate] whileFalse: [index := index \\ (numbers size) + 1. > total := total + numbers at: index. > (frequencies includes: total) > ifTrue: [duplicate := true] > ifFalse: [frequencies add: total]]. > > total |
In reply to this post by Roelof
Works fine with my Squeak and Pharo code. Result is 558 in both cases! ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 10:37:57 a.m. EST, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
Op 3-12-2018 om 16:13 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: > file := StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'C:\Recv\day.1.input'. > [file atEnd] whileFalse: [numbers add: (file nextLine asInteger)]. > file close. very wierd, on my Pharo 7 box I do not work. I also see a message that temp variables are not written or read Can you try your code on my input : https://gist.github.com/RoelofWobben/001a0d7f9a8d5b5a0ebbc3f133dbd032 and tell me the outcome. I have solved it already so you do not spoil anything Roelof |
Op 3-12-2018 om 17:01 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users:
Many many many thanks For me too and that is the answer I expect Two question, Why is trough StandardFileStream a line and can this also be rewritten with a StreamContents Roelof |
It's just a matter of taste and/or habit. Quite frankly, I never think about using #streamContents nor #readStream or other variations since I've always had to write that kinda code "the long way" since 1992 ! ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
On Monday, December 3, 2018, 11:09:31 a.m. EST, Roelof Wobben <[hidden email]> wrote:
Op 3-12-2018 om 17:01 schreef Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users: Many many many thanks For me too and that is the answer I expect Two question, Why is trough StandardFileStream a line and can this also be rewritten with a StreamContents Roelof |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |