chef needs revisiting

> On Jul 4, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Isn't MooseChef destined to disappear because now we'll have MooseQuery in Moose 6.0 (haven't checked it yet, just know that it provides similar functionality and is more generic in terms of knowledge of the underlying model).
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Chef engine needs to be revisited. The goal of this new version was to generalize the logic, and that is a good thing. However, the problem is that it does it at the expense of understandability by relying on string concatenation and perform:.
>
> We need to iterate on this one and look for another design, while preserving the current behavior.
>
> Would anyone be interested to dive in this area?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev