>From that perspective, pharo would love to get the collection extensions done in Moose.
But we never got the time to look at them + test.
Now it would be a good move.
I will try to get some time for this task but if someone wants to do it it would be cool.
Stef
On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Tudor Girba <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are a number of dirty packages in the Moose image. Most of these are due to us loading packages with extensions that are now present in Pharo 2.0.
>
> I removed:
> - BDDExtensions as a prerequisite to Glamour because it is already present in the image
> - I removed an Morph extension from Glamour
> - I removed a couple of methods from Mondrian that were extending Behavior and CompiledMethod
>
> There are still a couple left:
> - Moose-TestResources is dirty for some reason I do not understand, but I suspect it has to do with the latest CategoryImporter tests. Yuriy, could you take a look?
> - Object>>asMorph comes from Magritte and should be renamed to asMagritteMorph
> - some extensions from Grease were adopted by Pharo
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Beauty is where we see it."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Locked
