Hi,
Just out of curiosity, is anyone still working with a non-cog vm? I am asking because I was thinking of releasing 4.1 one click with a Cog VM. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
I'm using both.
But I prefer Cog vm. I think using a Cog vm is better for the one click. Cheers, Jannik On Sep 19, 2010, at 10:29 , Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Just out of curiosity, is anyone still working with a non-cog vm? > > I am asking because I was thinking of releasing 4.1 one click with a Cog VM. > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev --- Jannik Laval _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi,
i'm using only cog vm in particular the 5.8b9. Cheers, Fabrizio On 19 Sep 2010, at 11:57, Laval Jannik wrote: > I'm using both. > But I prefer Cog vm. > > I think using a Cog vm is better for the one click. > > Cheers, > Jannik > > On Sep 19, 2010, at 10:29 , Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just out of curiosity, is anyone still working with a non-cog vm? >> >> I am asking because I was thinking of releasing 4.1 one click with a Cog VM. >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > --- > Jannik Laval > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
I'm using both, since I'm still annoyed by the fact that I need to patch an image to use it with Cog. Just to things to check: - test with a pharo 1.1.1, since I guess that image should be used for Cog-ready images - can we call infusion from the latest version of Cog? I remember I could not do that in previous versions. On 19 sept. 2010, at 10:29, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Just out of curiosity, is anyone still working with a non-cog vm? > > I am asking because I was thinking of releasing 4.1 one click with a Cog VM. > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Simon Denier <[hidden email]> wrote:
I build a PharoDev on top of PharoCore 1.1.1 but there are several error/failing tests, and that's why I didn't make public release. Check my email about failing errors with Cog. Doru I would be aware of: - You are not able to run Test Coverage neither use objects as methods (using run:with:with) since this will crash the vm - some problems with certain plugins or menus Maybe Eliot or someone is already working on it. Cheers Mariano - can we call infusion from the latest version of Cog? I remember I could not do that in previous versions. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |