copying always the .sources ??? [WAS] Re: PharoCore 1.1 comments

>
>
> 2010/7/30 Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez <[hidden email]>
> Hi all,
>
> some things I noticed in PharoCore 1.1 release:
>
>
> - This PharoCore-1.1.zip doesn't include a sources file. It was good to
> have it included in the zip as before. Can be included for every
> PharoCore release?
>
> - The page says that PharoV10.sources is for use with 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2.
> Shouldn't be better to have a different one for each release? (even if
> 1.1 is a copy of 1.0, the different name avoids doubts about numbering
> scheme):
>
> PharoCore-1.0.image
> PharoCore-1.0.changes
> PharoV10.sources
>
> PharoCore-1.1.image
> PharoCore-1.1.changes
> PharoV10.sources    (???)
>
>
>
> I also thought about this and that could be confusing with newcomers. But if .sources didn't change in 1.1 and 1.2, is it necessary to have them?   or the note saying that PharoV10.sources works for all is enought ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
>
>  
> ...
>
> PharoCore-1.7.image
> PharoCore-1.7.changes
> PharoV10.sources    (bigger ???)
>
> Just a suggestion. ;)
>
> - SystemVersion current majorMinorVersion prints:
>
> PharoCore 1.0: 'PharoCore1.0'
>
> PharoCore 1.1: 'Pharo1.1'
>
> Maybe this should be in the script preparing the image so that correctly
> set the version string for PharoCore images and for Pharo images (or
> maybe already is there but wasn't executed?)
>
> Other than that, the new image is *very* fast!
>
> Cheers
> --
> Miguel Cobá
> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project