could be worth looking at MCM update mechanism

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

could be worth looking at MCM update mechanism

Stéphane Ducasse
From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab <at> gmx.de>
Subject: MCM update script
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Date: 2009-07-01 07:10:22 GMT (15 hours and 14 minutes ago)
Folks - I've set up a little test for the suggested MCM update script  
via Monticello. In order to try it out, do the following:
* Get a copy of http://ftp.squeak.org/3.10/Squeak3.10-7159-basic.zip
* Fire up Monticello and point it at http://squeaksource.com/MCUpdateTest
* Load the latest MonticelloConfigurations package from there and ONLY  
that package (the fixes included are a strict prerequisite for this to  
work)
  Now run the following code:
  MCMcmUpdater updateFromRepositories: #( 'http://squeaksource.com/MCUpdateTest' 
  ).
  This will go to the repository and discover that there is update-ar.
1.mcm and update-ar.2.mcm. It will load the first, find that there is  
nothing to do, move on to the second. The second has actually re-
ordered the Exceptions and the Morphic package to allow for loading of  
a modification enabling SystemProgressMorph to change its label. It  
then uses the configuration to update all the remaining listed  
packages (and you can see the effect of the updated label right away).  
If we'd find that at some point the order needs to be changed to be  
able to load a particular modification, we would just issue an  
update.mcm with the new order. Hope this illustrates what I am  
imagining for an update mechanism using Monticello.
  Cheers, - Andreas

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: could be worth looking at MCM update mechanism

Damien Cassou
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Stéphane
Ducasse<[hidden email]> wrote:
> From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab <at> gmx.de>
> Subject: MCM update script

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=911

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project