Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

13 messages Options

stepharo

could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

Hi

could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

Stef

Nicolas Cellier

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

2015-05-02 22:15 GMT+02:00 stepharo <[hidden email]>:

Hi

could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

Stef

-1 files are SO important ;)

Sean P. DeNigris

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

Administrator

In reply to this post by stepharo

stepharo wrote

could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

+1. But Nicolas wants to know if he can view the files in his favorite editor, `#(vim emacs) atRandom`ha ha

Cheers,
Sean

EstebanLM

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

I think it is not possible (that’s github stuff, not ours)… at least it was not possible 1.5yr ago when we did it with Camilo.
but I will take another look, in case things changed.

Esteban

> On 03 May 2015, at 04:41, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> stepharo wrote
>> could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?
>
> +1. But Nicolas wants to know if he can view the files in his favorite
> editor, `#(vim emacs) atRandom`ha ha
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/could-the-log-message-be-placed-on-top-of-the-files-in-the-commit-tp4823824p4823888.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

EstebanLM

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

in fact it was also not possible discriminate the mails they sent (it was all or nothing)… that’s why we receive two mails each commit, one complete unnecessary.

> On 03 May 2015, at 12:12, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I think it is not possible (that’s github stuff, not ours)… at least it was not possible 1.5yr ago when we did it with Camilo.
> but I will take another look, in case things changed.
>
> Esteban
>
>> On 03 May 2015, at 04:41, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> stepharo wrote
>>> could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?
>>
>> +1. But Nicolas wants to know if he can view the files in his favorite
>> editor, `#(vim emacs) atRandom`ha ha
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Cheers,
>> Sean
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/could-the-log-message-be-placed-on-top-of-the-files-in-the-commit-tp4823824p4823888.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>

Nicolas Cellier

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

In reply to this post by Sean P. DeNigris

2015-05-03 4:41 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]>:

stepharo wrote
> could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

+1. But Nicolas wants to know if he can view the files in his favorite
editor, `#(vim emacs) atRandom`ha ha

:)
Sure, I can even use ed, it's only with punch cards that I feel not that confortable - lack of practice I guess.

Seriously, i never read this litany of file names, that's essentially un-informative and could be removed.

Code diffs would be more valuable, but adopting the tools of file lovers must come with a cost ;)

Nicolas

-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/could-the-log-message-be-placed-on-top-of-the-files-in-the-commit-tp4823824p4823888.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Marcus Denker-4

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

In reply to this post by EstebanLM

On 03 May 2015, at 12:12, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:

I think it is not possible (that’s github stuff, not ours)… at least it was not possible 1.5yr ago when we did it with Camilo.
but I will take another look, in case things changed.

I think there is a chance to do it with this magical thing:

https://zapier.com

It seems to have an email parser that is very powerful…

so github would send there and then zappier could send a modified mail onwards (and swallow the branch one).

Marcus

Esteban

On 03 May 2015, at 04:41, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:

stepharo wrote
could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

+1. But Nicolas wants to know if he can view the files in his favorite
editor, `#(vim emacs) atRandom`ha ha

-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/could-the-log-message-be-placed-on-top-of-the-files-in-the-commit-tp4823824p4823888.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Ben Coman

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

In reply to this post by stepharo

I tried with this, but didn't know how to push it further...

https://github.com/github/github-services/compare/master...bencoman:master

cheers -ben

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:15 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

Stef

Ben Coman

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:15 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi

could we put the log of the commit on top before the touched files?

Stef

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:

I tried with this, but didn't know how to push it further...
https://github.com/github/github-services/compare/master...bencoman:master

cheers -ben

Whoops. Seems I missed actually submitting a pull request for the change. Now lets see how it goes.

cheers -ben

stepharo

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier

> Code diffs would be more valuable, but adopting the tools of file
> lovers must come with a cost ;)
>
>
Yes I would love that too.
I just want to compile a list of changes automatically.
May I can do in the scriptLoader instead of reparsing git.

EstebanLM

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

do you guys know that if you press in the link provided, for example:

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/cf09b156e5bc943d6b99a34016d64ac0e6e972b5

you will have all the diffs well organised and for free?

Esteban

ps: in fact, if possible, I wouldn’t publish even the list of files changed… just the commit message and the link

On 03 May 2015, at 18:23, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Code diffs would be more valuable, but adopting the tools of file lovers must come with a cost ;)

Yes I would love that too.
I just want to compile a list of changes automatically.
May I can do in the scriptLoader instead of reparsing git.

Nicolas Cellier

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

2015-05-03 18:54 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>:

do you guys know that if you press in the link provided, for example:

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/cf09b156e5bc943d6b99a34016d64ac0e6e972b5

you will have all the diffs well organised and for free?

Esteban

ps: in fact, if possible, I wouldn’t publish even the list of files changed… just the commit message and the link

Yes, message and link would be just enough.

And while asking, maybe more atomic commits (single issue at a time).

On 03 May 2015, at 18:23, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Code diffs would be more valuable, but adopting the tools of file lovers must come with a cost ;)

Yes I would love that too.
I just want to compile a list of changes automatically.
May I can do in the scriptLoader instead of reparsing git.

Nicolas Cellier

Re: could the log message be placed on top of the files in the commit?

2015-05-03 21:56 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>:

2015-05-03 18:54 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>:
do you guys know that if you press in the link provided, for example:

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/cf09b156e5bc943d6b99a34016d64ac0e6e972b5

you will have all the diffs well organised and for free?

Esteban

ps: in fact, if possible, I wouldn’t publish even the list of files changed… just the commit message and the link

Yes, message and link would be just enough.
And while asking, maybe more atomic commits (single issue at a time).

Beside, non atomic commits will introduce an expressiveness bias, at least as approximated by
http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2013/03/25/programming-languages-ranked-by-expressiveness/

;)

On 03 May 2015, at 18:23, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Code diffs would be more valuable, but adopting the tools of file lovers must come with a cost ;)

Yes I would love that too.
I just want to compile a list of changes automatically.
May I can do in the scriptLoader instead of reparsing git.