current status

> Ah, I've moved development to http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/tODE.html
>
> I guess I updated the project page[1], but didn't announce the change ...
> sorry ...
>
> Dale
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/tode/
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Germán Arduino" <[hidden email]>
> | To: "tode st" <[hidden email]>
> | Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2012 6:39:27 AM
> | Subject: Re: current status
> |
> | Hi Dale:
> |
> |
> | 2012/3/3 Dale Henrichs < [hidden email] >
> |
> |
> | Sebastian,
> |
> |
> | ----- Original Message -----
> | | From: "Sebastian Sastre" < [hidden email] >
> | | To: "tode st" < [hidden email] >
> |
> | | Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2012 7:47:58 AM
> | | Subject: Re: current status
> | |
> | | that sounds very good!
> | |
> | |
> | | BTW, I saw that tODE-one-click is done the "traditional" Seaside
> | | way.
> | | Do we have a chance to see how are you going at code level? As I'm
> | | new to Amber I'm very hungry for examples of Amber-SeasideRest web
> | | apps :)
> |
> | If you hit http://???/tools/amber-browser instead of
> | http://???/tools/tODE you'll get the amber browser for the Amber
> | code which includes the amber-side tODE code...
> |
> | http://???/tools/amber-tODE will get you to my most recent
> | experiments with the amber interface ..
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | I'm also very interested in study a bit these possibilities, but
> | can't find the urls amber-browser and amber-tODE. I started from the
> | one click image and updated all the stuff from the Naviode repo, but
> | surely I'm doing something wrong.
> |
> |
> | How I can get these examples?
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | I want to emphasize the objects in development and play down the
> | browser aspect ... it's objects that make Smalltalk most interesting
> | in the first place, so the objects should be foremost in the
> | development environment ...
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | +11111111111 :) Full agree!
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | My original plans for this year was to get back into tODE, however
> | the git/metacello work has popped up and I think that getting
> | smalltalk to work with git is something worth doing (especially
> | since it's not that far off:)...
> |
> | So I look forward to seeing and hearing what other people think ...
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | I haven't had the time to read about git/metacello, only very
> | superficially but I'm not sure of understand what will win (more
> | than the exposure) using git. Is not a way of loss the advantages
> | depicted in the previous point (objects, image) ?
> |
> |
> | Cheers.
> |
> |
> | Germán.
> |
> |
> |
>