direct image code exchange
Locked
direct image code exchange
 
|
Hi again,
I find my self more and more often showing others Pharo and very often it might be great to just push code changes from one image directly to another. Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a repository server? I already thought about webannouncements as a solution to broadcast/push code within the network. Or a shared remote playground that keeps a websocket connection between images and would provide an easy way to copy&paste snippets... @Stephan: How did you solve your latency issues with your remote introductions? Couldn't one just extend gui announcements by web announcements to remote control other images? Sebastian |
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
Something I do since years is to have my own cross-image-shared package cache or explicit directory-based monticello repository (added to your projects) where I have everything. Then, you can simply commit to your local directory based monticello report and load it in the other image..quite simple. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi again, |
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
In reply to this post by Sebastian Heidbrink-2
> On 07 Aug 2015, at 00:13, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a repository server? Yes, it is called ZnMonticelloServerDelegate - it is meant as an example, but it works. |
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Hi Mariano,
that is what I do, too. I mean a case where I sit next to somebody and he uses his own computer and we dabble around. After a while one sometimes want to just provide the other with some snippets or classes just implemented. Email and USB stick are not always an option... Sebastian On 2015-08-06 3:17 PM, Mariano Martinez
Peck wrote:
|
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
Hi Sven,
thank you! I will check it out. I'll have such situation more and more often. I'll let you know when I might have extended the code by some addons Sebastian On 2015-08-06 3:26 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> On 07 Aug 2015, at 00:13, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a repository server? > Yes, it is called ZnMonticelloServerDelegate - it is meant as an example, but it works. > |
|
|
On PharoDays, there was a demo of GTChatter ( https://youtu.be/Nmcou_5um2s?t=22m18s ), but it was just prototype, I don't think it's currently being developed. But maybe it could serve as a bases for code sharing between images/users. If anything you could simply push your code to http://ws.stfx.eu/ (Playground can do that with a button), and then paste the link through GTSpotter to the other user. If you paste that link into GTSpotter, it automatically offers you the option to open playground on it (eg. try pasting into GTSpotter http://ws.stfx.eu/923KR0YD1BRU ). Peter On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Sven, |
|
|
Although this would work better for scripts than classes. (Unless you could push fileouts through GTChatter). Peter On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
In reply to this post by Sebastian Heidbrink-2
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote:
OK, I see now. So for that what I do is that I have a "MarianoSandbox" repository in Shub which is public write access and I simply commit there... But I don't remember if even if the project is public write, if someone would still need a Shub user, which in your case would not be fun. Cheers,
|
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On 8/6/15, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Something I do since years is to have my own cross-image-shared package > cache or explicit directory-based monticello repository (added to your > projects) where I have everything. Then, you can simply commit to your > local directory based monticello report and load it in the other > image..quite simple. Simple and efficient indeed! +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> I find my self more and more often showing others Pharo and very often it >> might be great to just push code changes from one image directly to >> another. >> >> Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a >> repository server? >> >> I already thought about webannouncements as a solution to broadcast/push >> code within the network. >> Or a shared remote playground that keeps a websocket connection between >> images and would provide an easy way to copy&paste snippets... >> >> @Stephan: How did you solve your latency issues with your remote >> introductions? Couldn't one just extend gui announcements by web >> announcements to remote control other images? >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > |
Re: direct image code exchange
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
[OT]Wow![/OT]
Cheers,
Sean |
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
|
|
Hi Juraj,
At the last data week and in the workshops, we have an interesting user case: sharing code snippets between assistants to the workshop. For that we setup an Etherpad at the beginning of the workshop where we share notes and code snippets by their url on http://ws.stfx.eu. This has worked pretty fine and the only thing I can think for an improvement would be having something like "ethepads" inside the Pharo Image, allowing participants to write collaboratively docs and scripts inside Pharo. You can see and examples of such case of use here: http://mutabit.com/deltas/repos.fossil/dataweek/home (mostly in Spanish but the use of Etherpads and published playgrounds is understandable). Cheers, Offray On 07/08/15 08:23, Juraj Kubelka wrote:
|
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
|
|
Hi Juraj,
Coloring is a default on etherpad. Because we're sharing a physical space, color let us to find who wrote what to see who is giving advice or is needing help. So yes, is important because it let us learn better. Chévere que entiendas español :-) Cheers, Offray On 08/08/15 20:33, Juraj Kubelka wrote:
|
Re: direct image code exchange
|
|
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |