what I know is that FileDirectory code is far from suboptimal
Stef
On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Please take alook at FileDirectory>>directoryContentsFor:. Does it
> have any business being on the instance side of FileDirectory? It
> looks like it _completely_ ignores the receiver and if anything
> should be a class method somewhere, or changed to work relative to a
> receiver, or something.
>
> Bill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Locked
