does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Stéphane Ducasse
does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?
Stef

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

SergeStinckwich
only BackTalk: http://www.squeaksource.com/BackTalk.html

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?
> Stef
>
>



--
Serge Stinckwich
UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Noury Bouraqadi-2

On 8 nov. 2010, at 14:14, Serge Stinckwich wrote:

> only BackTalk: http://www.squeaksource.com/BackTalk.html
>
Yes. More info on Douai's wiki:
http://vst.mines-douai.fr/BackTalk

Noury

> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?
>> Stef
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://doesnotunderstand.org/
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Chip Nowacek
Is there a roadmap for further progress? A RETE-based system is critical for my work and I'd like to help out where I can. I also believe many would benefit if the facility was available and they understood what it could do for them. Would you recommend someone just coming to BackTalk work with the original or NG? That is, is NG done "enough" to be operational?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Chip Nowacek
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
What inference engine is behind the code critic facility? I'm not smart enough yet to figure it out myself. I tried.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Chip Nowacek
In reply to this post by Noury Bouraqadi-2
When I try to load BT-ggf.30.mcz (squeaksource.com/BackTalk) I get what's below. I wish I was clever enough to figure out how to get past this:

This package depends on the following classes:
  View
You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these definitions:
  AbstractBoardView
  AbstractBoardView>>changeNbSquares
  AbstractBoardView>>changeNbSquaresSquared
  AbstractBoardView>>changeSquareSize
  AbstractBoardView>>defaultControllerClass
  AbstractBoardView>>displayOn:
  AbstractBoardView>>displaySquare:on:
  AbstractBoardView>>initSquareBounds
  AbstractBoardView>>initialize
  AbstractBoardView>>model:
  AbstractBoardView>>redisplaySquare:
  AbstractBoardView>>redisplaySquares:
  AbstractBoardView>>squareAtPosition:
  AbstractBoardView>>squareSize
  AbstractBoardView>>squareSize:
  BTSolutionView
  BTSolutionView classSide>>initialize
  BTSolutionView classSide>>openOn:
  BTSolutionView>>displayOn:
  BTSolutionView>>update


Select Proceed to continue, or close this window to cancel the operation.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Stéphane Ducasse
In reply to this post by Chip Nowacek
Hi chip


> Is there a roadmap for further progress?

here is what I did:
        - check the version published in VWstore by kris Gybels
        Kris just published a version from the old VW code around but he did not make it dwork in
        VW 7...

        - I did not try but indeed this would be nice to have it. I have collected a lot of doc around neopus.
       
        - Neopus has a slightly modified syntax and it used APOK (advanced compiler of VW) but
        even when I loaded it, it did not work. May be the best would be to try again and see
        if we cannot use either pragma annotations or petit parser for the rules


Stef
       

> A RETE-based system is critical for
> my work and I'd like to help out where I can. I also believe many would
> benefit if the facility was available and they understood what it could do
> for them.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: does anybody ported neopus to squeak/pharo?

Stéphane Ducasse
In reply to this post by Chip Nowacek
Bakctalk is not about RETE this is a constraint solvers.


On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:32 AM, Chip Nowacek wrote:

>
> When I try to load BT-ggf.30.mcz (squeaksource.com/BackTalk) I get what's
> below. I wish I was clever enough to figure out how to get past this:
>
> This package depends on the following classes:
>  View
> You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these
> definitions:
>  AbstractBoardView
>  AbstractBoardView>>changeNbSquares
>  AbstractBoardView>>changeNbSquaresSquared
>  AbstractBoardView>>changeSquareSize
>  AbstractBoardView>>defaultControllerClass
>  AbstractBoardView>>displayOn:
>  AbstractBoardView>>displaySquare:on:
>  AbstractBoardView>>initSquareBounds
>  AbstractBoardView>>initialize
>  AbstractBoardView>>model:
>  AbstractBoardView>>redisplaySquare:
>  AbstractBoardView>>redisplaySquares:
>  AbstractBoardView>>squareAtPosition:
>  AbstractBoardView>>squareSize
>  AbstractBoardView>>squareSize:
>  BTSolutionView
>  BTSolutionView classSide>>initialize
>  BTSolutionView classSide>>openOn:
>  BTSolutionView>>displayOn:
>  BTSolutionView>>update
>
>
> Select Proceed to continue, or close this window to cancel the operation.
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/does-anybody-ported-neopus-to-squeak-pharo-tp3031913p3164095.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>