glamour and low-level roassal api

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

glamour and low-level roassal api

Usman Bhatti
Hello,

I had built a few visualizations in Galmour based on low-level roassal api. I download a new version of Moose and the now glamour returns an object of ROMondrianViewBuilder instead of ROView, which breaks my visualizations. So, does glamour aim to provide a way to work with the low-level api or should I just create my own extensions to adapt my visualization to the new mode?

tx,
Usman

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: glamour and low-level roassal api

Usman Bhatti
Ok, so there seems to be a way to obtain a pointer to low-level object from the builder view.

ROMondrianViewBuilder >> view ...

usman

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello,

I had built a few visualizations in Galmour based on low-level roassal api. I download a new version of Moose and the now glamour returns an object of ROMondrianViewBuilder instead of ROView, which breaks my visualizations. So, does glamour aim to provide a way to work with the low-level api or should I just create my own extensions to adapt my visualization to the new mode?

tx,
Usman


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: glamour and low-level roassal api

abergel
#raw is your friend in that case. Doru and I agree on the name last week.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On Jun 15, 2012, at 1:03 AM, Usman Bhatti wrote:

> Ok, so there seems to be a way to obtain a pointer to low-level object from the builder view.
>
> ROMondrianViewBuilder >> view ...
>
> usman
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had built a few visualizations in Galmour based on low-level roassal api. I download a new version of Moose and the now glamour returns an object of ROMondrianViewBuilder instead of ROView, which breaks my visualizations. So, does glamour aim to provide a way to work with the low-level api or should I just create my own extensions to adapt my visualization to the new mode?
>
> tx,
> Usman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev