glamour circular transmissions are back :)
Locked
glamour circular transmissions are back :)
 
|
Hi,
I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting Glamour bug that prevented the correct refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in creating complex browsers. For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity and highlight it in the visualization. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Some battles are better lost than fought." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
what was the problem?
Stef On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting Glamour bug that prevented the correct > refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. > > This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in creating complex browsers. > > For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity and highlight it in the visualization. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Some battles are better lost than fought." > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
A subtle side effect of overriding GLMPresentation>>=.
Doru On 22 Aug 2010, at 21:32, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > what was the problem? > > Stef > > On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting >> Glamour bug that prevented the correct >> refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. >> >> This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in >> creating complex browsers. >> >> For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom >> visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity >> and highlight it in the visualization. >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Some battles are better lost than fought." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
On 22 août 2010, at 18:32, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting Glamour bug that prevented the correct > refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. > > This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in creating complex browsers. > > For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity and highlight it in the visualization. Good. I think it was just the one critical issue for 4.1 Does somebody see some critical remaining issue? Meanwhile, I suggest for the coming week that we test and report (and fix) any usability issue which affects the user experience on a daily basis. -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
Hi,
I perfectly agree. We should release a beta now. The main issues would be: - There are two failing tests left: http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/302/ - the slowness of mondrian in DSM - add PetitJava to Configuration (and possibly to code highlighting) Doru On 23 Aug 2010, at 13:28, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 22 août 2010, at 18:32, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting >> Glamour bug that prevented the correct >> refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. >> >> This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in >> creating complex browsers. >> >> For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom >> visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity >> and highlight it in the visualization. > > > > Good. I think it was just the one critical issue for 4.1 > > Does somebody see some critical remaining issue? > > > Meanwhile, I suggest for the coming week that we test and report > (and fix) any usability issue which affects the user experience on a > daily basis. > > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "One cannot do more than one can do." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
> - the slowness of mondrian in DSM
Yesterday I produced a fix. Have you tried since then? Cheers, Alexandre > > > On 23 Aug 2010, at 13:28, Simon Denier wrote: > >> >> On 22 août 2010, at 18:32, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting Glamour bug that prevented the correct >>> refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. >>> >>> This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in creating complex browsers. >>> >>> For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity and highlight it in the visualization. >> >> >> >> Good. I think it was just the one critical issue for 4.1 >> >> Does somebody see some critical remaining issue? >> >> >> Meanwhile, I suggest for the coming week that we test and report (and fix) any usability issue which affects the user experience on a daily basis. >> >> >> -- >> Simon >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "One cannot do more than one can do." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
On 23 août 2010, at 17:49, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> - the slowness of mondrian in DSM > > Yesterday I produced a fix. Have you tried since then? I think we are referring to the isAbstractClass check in MOShape>>new, which is really too costly (actually there is no other client for this method in the whole Pharo image :)) > > Cheers, > Alexandre > >> >> >> On 23 Aug 2010, at 13:28, Simon Denier wrote: >> >>> >>> On 22 août 2010, at 18:32, Tudor Girba wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting Glamour bug that prevented the correct >>>> refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. >>>> >>>> This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom in creating complex browsers. >>>> >>>> For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity and highlight it in the visualization. >>> >>> >>> >>> Good. I think it was just the one critical issue for 4.1 >>> >>> Does somebody see some critical remaining issue? >>> >>> >>> Meanwhile, I suggest for the coming week that we test and report (and fix) any usability issue which affects the user experience on a daily basis. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "One cannot do more than one can do." >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: glamour circular transmissions are back :)
|
|
Indeed, we are referring to isAbstractClass. From the tests of Jannik,
instantiation is an order of magnitude slower. Cheers, Doru On 23 Aug 2010, at 18:22, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 23 août 2010, at 17:49, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>> - the slowness of mondrian in DSM >> >> Yesterday I produced a fix. Have you tried since then? > > > I think we are referring to the isAbstractClass check in > MOShape>>new, which is really too costly (actually there is no other > client for this method in the whole Pharo image :)) > > >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >>> >>> >>> On 23 Aug 2010, at 13:28, Simon Denier wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 22 août 2010, at 18:32, Tudor Girba wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am very happy to announce that Andrei solved the long-lasting >>>>> Glamour bug that prevented the correct >>>>> refresh of browsers with circular dependencies between panes. >>>>> >>>>> This means that from now on, we have significantly more freedom >>>>> in creating complex browsers. >>>>> >>>>> For example, in the Meta Browser, if you click on the bottom >>>>> visualization, the browser will properly navigate to that entity >>>>> and highlight it in the visualization. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Good. I think it was just the one critical issue for 4.1 >>>> >>>> Does somebody see some critical remaining issue? >>>> >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, I suggest for the coming week that we test and report >>>> (and fix) any usability issue which affects the user experience >>>> on a daily basis. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Simon >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "One cannot do more than one can do." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |