glamour on pharo 1.4
Locked
 
|
Hi,
I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) best, Esteban _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Esteban,
Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now. Cheers, Doru On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > > I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. > I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) > > best, > Esteban > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3.
best, Esteban El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > Hi Esteban, > > Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. >> I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) >> >> best, >> Esteban >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Theoretically yes. In practice:
- The Glamour configuration does not have proper versioning numbers (and basically no real way to update those numbers properly). It would be great to get one working, but it is also important to have it working within the whole of Moose, which is not so easy apparently. Would you like to work on this? - Working in the same repository for two versions of Pharo will create a mess with the numbering scheme. I would be happy to be proved wrong. Cheers, Doru On 7 Feb 2012, at 21:41, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3. > > best, > Esteban > > El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > >> Hi Esteban, >> >> Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now. >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. >>> I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) >>> >>> best, >>> Esteban >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Presenting is storytelling." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi,
I think next moose move is to run in pharo 1.4. Isn't? So, best approach is start moving moose components to pharo, step by step. This is where metacello can be really valuable: -you move glamour -then you move another moose component, etc. -in the end, you move all moose. In the mean time, you can keep moose for 1.3 with some bugfixes if needed (and yes, you will have some mess in version, if you doit wrong: best way is to not use same autoassigned numbers for bugfix monticello versions). For instance "Glamour-Helpers-Author-NewNumber.mcz" could be numbered: "Glamour-Helpers-FixNumber-Author-OldNumber.mcz" (sounds messy, but as there shouldn't be much fix versions, not a really issue) But this is, of course, in the assumption effort will be moving to 1.4 as a priority (and I think it should). I can prepare a metacello version for glamour in pharo 1.4, yes... best, Esteban El 08/02/2012, a las 3:50a.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > Theoretically yes. In practice: > - The Glamour configuration does not have proper versioning numbers (and basically no real way to update those numbers properly). It would be great to get one working, but it is also important to have it working within the whole of Moose, which is not so easy apparently. Would you like to work on this? > - Working in the same repository for two versions of Pharo will create a mess with the numbering scheme. I would be happy to be proved wrong. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 21:41, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3. >> >> best, >> Esteban >> >> El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió: >> >>> Hi Esteban, >>> >>> Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. >>>> I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) >>>> >>>> best, >>>> Esteban >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Presenting is storytelling." > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think next moose move is to run in pharo 1.4. Isn't? After we release 1.3. As I said, the problem is that we do not have a proper configuration for 1.3, so we are stuck. > So, best approach is start moving moose components to pharo, step by step. This is where metacello can be really valuable: > -you move glamour > -then you move another moose component, etc. > -in the end, you move all moose. > In the mean time, you can keep moose for 1.3 with some bugfixes if needed (and yes, you will have some mess in version, if you doit wrong: best way is to not use same autoassigned numbers for bugfix monticello versions). For instance "Glamour-Helpers-Author-NewNumber.mcz" could be numbered: "Glamour-Helpers-FixNumber-Author-OldNumber.mcz" (sounds messy, but as there shouldn't be much fix versions, not a really issue) > But this is, of course, in the assumption effort will be moving to 1.4 as a priority (and I think it should). It is, but first we have to release 4.6 on pharo 1.3. > I can prepare a metacello version for glamour in pharo 1.4, yes... Actually, I am first interested in the configuration for 1.3. Afterwards the 1.4 one :). Cheers, Doru > best, > Esteban > > El 08/02/2012, a las 3:50a.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > >> Theoretically yes. In practice: >> - The Glamour configuration does not have proper versioning numbers (and basically no real way to update those numbers properly). It would be great to get one working, but it is also important to have it working within the whole of Moose, which is not so easy apparently. Would you like to work on this? >> - Working in the same repository for two versions of Pharo will create a mess with the numbering scheme. I would be happy to be proved wrong. >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 7 Feb 2012, at 21:41, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3. >>> >>> best, >>> Esteban >>> >>> El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió: >>> >>>> Hi Esteban, >>>> >>>> Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. >>>>> I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?) >>>>> >>>>> best, >>>>> Esteban >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Presenting is storytelling." >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi,
El 08/02/2012, a las 10:10a.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
I thought Guille made it... if not, I first will create a configuration for 1.3, ok :) Esteban _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Esteban,
How are we on this topic? Cheers, Doru On 8 Feb 2012, at 14:19, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > > El 08/02/2012, a las 10:10a.m., Tudor Girba escribió: >> >>> I can prepare a metacello version for glamour in pharo 1.4, yes... >> >> Actually, I am first interested in the configuration for 1.3. >> Afterwards the 1.4 one :). > > I thought Guille made it... if not, I first will create a configuration for 1.3, ok :) > > Esteban > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Hi Doru,
I'm working on this today :) I hope to have some news by the afternoon. best, Esteban El 13/02/2012, a las 1:38a.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > Hi Esteban, > > How are we on this topic? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 8 Feb 2012, at 14:19, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> El 08/02/2012, a las 10:10a.m., Tudor Girba escribió: >>> >>>> I can prepare a metacello version for glamour in pharo 1.4, yes... >>> >>> Actually, I am first interested in the configuration for 1.3. >>> Afterwards the 1.4 one :). >> >> I thought Guille made it... if not, I first will create a configuration for 1.3, ok :) >> >> Esteban >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |