>Would you be terribly unhappy to check with Seaside 3.1? It should be
>fixed there part of the general better Pharo 2.0 support without >breaking backwards compatibility. Also there is an experimental spec >based UI that replaces the OB based one. And a totally new >configuration. Now I know it's not been officially released yet be we >need people using and testing it. where is the config? Thx T. _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>Would you be terribly unhappy to check with Seaside 3.1? It should be >>fixed there part of the general better Pharo 2.0 support without >>breaking backwards compatibility. Also there is an experimental spec >>based UI that replaces the OB based one. And a totally new >>configuration. Now I know it's not been officially released yet be we >>need people using and testing it. > > where is the config? In the Seaside31 repository [1] called ConfigurationOfSeaside30. This was done for backwards compatibility so if you have an extension that works in both 3.0 and 3.1 you can use the same configuration for both. [1] www.squeaksource.com/Seaside31.html Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Hi Philippe, Sorry for the late reply. What exactly would you like me to test? To load the ConfigurationOfSeaside31 on top of Pharo 1.4, or on top of Pharo 2.0?
Doru On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Philippe, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > What exactly would you like me to test? To load the ConfigurationOfSeaside31 > on top of Pharo 1.4, or on top of Pharo 2.0? ConfigurationOfSeaside30 from the 3.1 repo [1] on top of Pharo 2.0 Yes, it's a bit confusing that ConfigurationOfSeaside30 loads Seaside 3.1. [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Seaside31.html Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Ok. I will do it.
Doru On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> Sorry for the late reply. >> >> What exactly would you like me to test? To load the ConfigurationOfSeaside31 >> on top of Pharo 1.4, or on top of Pharo 2.0? > > ConfigurationOfSeaside30 from the 3.1 repo [1] on top of Pharo 2.0 > > Yes, it's a bit confusing that ConfigurationOfSeaside30 loads Seaside 3.1. > > [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Seaside31.html > > Cheers > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside -- www.tudorgirba.com "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier." _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |