Hi,
We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation. We need a bit of feedback for this one: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach." |
Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> writes:
> Hi, > > We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation. > > We need a bit of feedback for this one: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results > > Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes. I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be working fine. Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo expression that loads the patch. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill |
> On 24 Feb 2016, at 11:24, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation. >> >> We need a bit of feedback for this one: >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results >> >> Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes. > > I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be > working fine. Yes, it works very well ! > Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo > expression that loads the patch. > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill |
In reply to this post by Damien Cassou-2
Hi,
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation. >> >> We need a bit of feedback for this one: >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results >> >> Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes. > > I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be > working fine. Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo > expression that loads the patch. Indeed, it is now in the image. Unfortunately, there was no feedback :(. I will do it better next time. I just thought that given the urgency with which issues were reported, people would have been more eager to test, so I hurried up :). Cheers, Doru > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Quality cannot be an afterthought." |
Hi Doru,
I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate. Cheers, Christophe |
Hi,
Thanks. Indeed, I agree with you. In fact, this is what we did, and then I was told that people would rather want to discuss beforehand :). So, actually, this was a little experiment. The thing is that we do not want to disturb people, but we need the feedback to improve fast. So, right now it looks like the only real way to get feedback is to push the changes. This has the tendency to create some annoyance, but we are trying to react as fast as we can to limit it. I hope this will be Ok with everyone. Cheers, Doru > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Christophe Demarey <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Doru, > > I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) > You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate. > > Cheers, > Christophe > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier." |
right now feels a lot better than before.
also the explicit (visible) keybingins to filter are a great addition :) Esteban > On 24 Feb 2016, at 19:34, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks. Indeed, I agree with you. In fact, this is what we did, and then I was told that people would rather want to discuss beforehand :). So, actually, this was a little experiment. > > The thing is that we do not want to disturb people, but we need the feedback to improve fast. So, right now it looks like the only real way to get feedback is to push the changes. This has the tendency to create some annoyance, but we are trying to react as fast as we can to limit it. I hope this will be Ok with everyone. > > Cheers, > Doru > > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Christophe Demarey <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi Doru, >> >> I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) >> You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate. >> >> Cheers, >> Christophe >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier." > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |