Hi
This is several times that I ask and I got no reaction but the printOn: of FAMIX entities is a problem. I do not think that it makes sense to have ClassName in namespace (namespace) :: namespace (namespace) (class) So how do we address it? - I would introduce either a strategy to control what is displayed - I would make the dinstction between full name and name. Of course I can hack it and have my own implementation because it really get on my nerves that I cannot even see the name of a class in a set in the inspector. Syeg _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Syeg :), printOn: is not at all ideal, but nobody did anything so it remained like that. Any improvement is more than welcome. Doru On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi "Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On Dec 7, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
I sa that there is mooseNameOn: and printOn: The mooseNameOn: looks better (more compact to me). Now do we want to have a little object shared by model that specify the printing of the entities? Stef
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
I think we do not need to complicate things. How about making printOn: be a mooseName + the type of the object. Doru On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Stef
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
mooseNameOn: is used for constructing mooseName in order to support looking up entities by name. I am also of the opinion that printOn: should just call it and add the type in parentheses only for the receiver. Doru On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |