Hi All,
I'm sure Im opening an old topic but anyway, as I was riding the train to work today I saw a shop called "Audio Images" and it struck me how overloaded the term image is, and how poor a term for the contents of the image file Smalltalk image is. What's in the image is a snapshot of... almost the entire system (minus platform-specific virtual machine and possibly minus sources). So Smalltalk system file would be a far better term and stsys a more unique file extension (and according to Wikipedia STS is unused too). I can imagine that changing form image would be hugely expensive in documentation terms (docs, websites, workspaces, etc, etc). But I can at least dream of a better term.
P.S. I know, wasting one's time worrying about names. Almost as bad as worrying about colours "And the wheel," said the Captain, "What about this wheel thingy? It sounds a terribly interesting project."
"Ah," said the marketing girl, "Well, we're having a little difficulty there." "Difficulty?" exclaimed Ford. "Difficulty? What do you mean, difficulty? It's the single simplest machine in the entire Universe!" The marketing girl soured him with a look. "Alright, Mr. Wiseguy," she said, "if you're so clever, you tell us what colour it should be." _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Friday 12 March 2010 11:29:20 pm Eliot Miranda wrote:
> I'm sure Im opening an old topic but anyway, as I was riding the train > to work today I saw a shop called "Audio Images" and it struck me how > overloaded the term image is, and how poor a term for the contents of the > image file Smalltalk image is. What's in the image is a snapshot of... > almost the entire system (minus platform-specific virtual machine and > possibly minus sources). So Smalltalk system file would be a far better > term and stsys a more unique file extension (and according to Wikipedia STS > is unused too). If ever we change the image format, we should also change its name and extension. The first time people hear the term, they think of 'picture'. I suppose the term image is a Mac hangover :-). I prefer "bit bag" (*.bag) or "bag of bits" (*.bob). BTW, sts is already taken (Microsoft Visual C) Subbu _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Eliot Miranda-2
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Bruce Boyer <[hidden email]> wrote:
Right. That's why I don't like either snapshot or image. What are these snapshots or images of? They are intentionally abstract terms and are unhelpful. Yes, snapshot is much better, but still hopelessly abstract.
But I see a snapshot file are more than just a memory dump. It /is/ the entire Smalltalk system, class library, potentially compiler, debugger, tools. It is in a format that requires the virtual machine to run it, but it is in fact the Smalltalk system in quiescent form. It is not a memory dump. It is only a dump of the Smalltalk object heap, not the entire memory space.
It is more than just a way of saving the state. It is also a way of moving that state and resuming it on a different system. Once you have the virtual machine key you can unlock the image, uh, system, but everything you need to program the system (beyond execution display and input devices) is there.
I forget...
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Eliot Miranda-2
Interesting idea.
Stef Begin forwarded message:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |