Hi!
I often experience that ancestors are not properly marked as non-bold in monticello. Consider the following: Why .5.mcz is in bold since it is the ancestor of version 6? Am I the only one to experience this? Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
Hi Alexandre,
with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: .6 in your image has .4 as ancestor; and .6 in your repository has .5 as ancestor... If you could, I'd like that, on that very same inspector, you inspect the model of the PluggableListMorph (Ctrl+Shift+Click on the left pane, choose inspect, choose PluggableIconListMorph, choose the model, and tell me what you have in the selectPackageAncestors. Thierry Le 25/04/2015 17:46, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : > Hi! > > I often experience that ancestors are not properly marked as non-bold in > monticello. Consider the following: > > > Why .5.mcz is in bold since it is the ancestor of version 6? > > Am I the only one to experience this? > > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > |
> On 25 Apr 2015, at 18:00, Thierry Goubier <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, > > with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. > > But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: > > .6 in your image has .4 as ancestor; and .6 in your repository has .5 as ancestor… Sorry for this remark, but is this really perrfect that the same version of the same project can have two different ancestors depending in which repository it is? :) Uko > > If you could, I'd like that, on that very same inspector, you inspect the model of the PluggableListMorph (Ctrl+Shift+Click on the left pane, choose inspect, choose PluggableIconListMorph, choose the model, and tell me what you have in the selectPackageAncestors. > > Thierry > > Le 25/04/2015 17:46, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : >> Hi! >> >> I often experience that ancestors are not properly marked as non-bold in >> monticello. Consider the following: >> >> >> Why .5.mcz is in bold since it is the ancestor of version 6? >> >> Am I the only one to experience this? >> >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> > > |
Le 25/04/2015 18:09, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
> >> On 25 Apr 2015, at 18:00, Thierry Goubier <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> with Esteban, we've been chasing around some of those bugs around for a while. >> >> But, in your case, it could perfectly be that: >> >> .6 in your image has .4 as ancestor; and .6 in your repository has .5 as ancestor… > > Sorry for this remark, but is this really perrfect that the same version of the same project can have two different ancestors depending in which repository it is? Yes, it is Monticello perfect :) Thierry > :) > Uko > >> >> If you could, I'd like that, on that very same inspector, you inspect the model of the PluggableListMorph (Ctrl+Shift+Click on the left pane, choose inspect, choose PluggableIconListMorph, choose the model, and tell me what you have in the selectPackageAncestors. >> >> Thierry >> >> Le 25/04/2015 17:46, Alexandre Bergel a écrit : >>> Hi! >>> >>> I often experience that ancestors are not properly marked as non-bold in >>> monticello. Consider the following: >>> >>> >>> Why .5.mcz is in bold since it is the ancestor of version 6? >>> >>> Am I the only one to experience this? >>> >>> Alexandre >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > |
In reply to this post by Uko2
On 25/04/15 18:09, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> Sorry for this remark, but is this really perrfect that the same version of the same project can have two different ancestors depending in which repository it is? It is a distributed version control system that uses increasing numbers instead of UUIDs to number versions. It is not the same version, it just has the same number ;) Git is a much newer DVCS, and has solved some of the problems found in earlier ones. Stephan |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |