mariano
I was thinking about the problem of managing pharo with metacello we should start with the simple ones: the ones we removed from the system - Sounds - LedMorph - MorphicExamples - (ArchiveViewer) Then check the packages that are shared. May be we can also publish metacello descriptions to load them. and we republish them when they changed. For example for OB I think that lukas publish in squeaksource the latest version colin ships as sar files. So we can publish in the OBSqueakSouce (not sure that this is good) or in pharo a ConfigurationOfOB Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: mariano I am agree. Those are the easier. Then check the packages that are shared. May be we can also publish metacello descriptions to load them. Yes, my idea is to publish all the ConfigurationOf... not in their own repositories, but in MetacelloRepository. For example for OB I think that lukas publish in squeaksource I think we can create a ConfigurationOfOB, published in MetacelloRepository (like the other projects) and putting pharo specific in spec for: #pharo and not in spec for: #common (checking of course what goes to what). Cheers, Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
excellent!
Stef On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > mariano > > I was thinking about the problem of managing pharo with metacello > we should start with the simple ones: the ones we removed from the system > - Sounds > - LedMorph > - MorphicExamples > - (ArchiveViewer) > > > I am agree. Those are the easier. > > Then check the packages that are shared. May be we can also publish metacello descriptions to load them. > and we republish them when they changed. > > Yes, my idea is to publish all the ConfigurationOf... not in their own repositories, but in MetacelloRepository. > > For example for OB I think that lukas publish in squeaksource > the latest version colin ships as sar files. So we can publish in the OBSqueakSouce (not sure that this is good) > or in pharo a ConfigurationOfOB > > I think we can create a ConfigurationOfOB, published in MetacelloRepository (like the other projects) and putting pharo specific in spec for: #pharo and not in spec for: #common (checking of course what goes to what). > > Cheers, > > Mariano > > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |