migration to FogBugz

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

migration to FogBugz

Ben Coman
I just noticed (for example) that
https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6763
has been migrated as https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6700.

Is that change of issue number a concern to break the convention of
slice names matching issue numbers
as well as historical issue cross referencing?

hope I'm missing something..

regards -ben



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: migration to FogBugz

Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)
The problem is that you can not specify a id for issue while migrating.

To prevent collision, the issues reported to fogbugz should start at id: 10000.

Ben

On Mar 10, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:

I just noticed (for example) that https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6763
has been migrated as https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6700.

Is that change of issue number a concern to break the convention of slice names matching issue numbers
as well as historical issue cross referencing?

hope I'm missing something..

regards -ben




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: migration to FogBugz

Camillo Bruni-3
that implies that we have to migrate the PharoInbox :)
otherwise we will have a mess of higher order matching slices numbers and issue numbers on fogbugz.

On 2013-03-10, at 18:13, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:

> The problem is that you can not specify a id for issue while migrating.
>
> To prevent collision, the issues reported to fogbugz should start at id: 10000.
>
> Ben
>
> On Mar 10, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I just noticed (for example) that https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6763
>> has been migrated as https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6700.
>>
>> Is that change of issue number a concern to break the convention of slice names matching issue numbers
>> as well as historical issue cross referencing?
>>
>> hope I'm missing something..
>>
>> regards -ben
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: migration to FogBugz

Ben Coman
Camillo Bruni wrote:
> that implies that we have to migrate the PharoInbox :)
> otherwise we will have a mess of higher order matching slices numbers and issue numbers on fogbugz.
>
> On 2013-03-10, at 18:13, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>  
>> The problem is that you can not specify a id for issue while migrating.
>>    

This might not be useful at this stage, but I would guess that starting
with an empty Fogbugz tracker, you could create a blank case, then suck
the matching case number from Google, after which you update the Fogbugz
case title.
-ben

>> To prevent collision, the issues reported to fogbugz should start at id: 10000.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>> I just noticed (for example) that https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6763
>>> has been migrated as https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/6700.
>>>
>>> Is that change of issue number a concern to break the convention of slice names matching issue numbers
>>> as well as historical issue cross referencing?
>>>
>>> hope I'm missing something..
>>>
>>> regards -ben
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>
>
>
>