Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

6 messages Options

Tudor Girba-2

moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

Hi,

The Moose build just broke due to the loadRefactorings method being removed from ConfigurationOfNautilus.

In general, it would be great to remove as little methods as possible from Configuration classes.

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."

fstephany

Re: moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

It confuses me that some projects have their own set of class methods to
load groups.

Would not it be better to just call
ConfigurationOfNautilus project stable load: 'Refactorings' ?

What is the recommended practice?

On 18/04/12 23:17, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The Moose build just broke due to the loadRefactorings method being removed from ConfigurationOfNautilus.
>
> In general, it would be great to remove as little methods as possible from Configuration classes.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>
>

--
http://tulipemoutarde.be
CA: +1 778 558 3225
BE: +32 65 709 131

philippeback

Re: moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

+1000

2012/4/19 Francois Stephany <[hidden email]>

It confuses me that some projects have their own set of class methods to load groups.

Would not it be better to just call
ConfigurationOfNautilus project stable load: 'Refactorings' ?

What is the recommended practice?

On 18/04/12 23:17, Tudor Girba wrote:

Hi,

The Moose build just broke due to the loadRefactorings method being removed from ConfigurationOfNautilus.

In general, it would be great to remove as little methods as possible from Configuration classes.

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."

--
http://tulipemoutarde.be
CA: <a href="tel:%2B1%20778%20558%203225" value="+17785583225" target="_blank">+1 778 558 3225
BE: <a href="tel:%2B32%2065%20709%20131" value="+3265709131" target="_blank">+32 65 709 131

Philippe Back

"Helping you hit the top 3 outcomes you really want to achieve"

Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail: [hidden email] | Web: http://philippeback.eu | Blog:

http://philippeback.be

High Octane SPRL

rue cour Boisacq 101

1301 Bierges

Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)

Re: moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2

I am sorry :(

But we were preparing Nautilus for Pharo 2.0, and we wanted to reduce the amount of groups to not disturb to much users.

So now there are 'core' and 'release' groups...

Sorry again, and thank you for using Nautilus :)

Ben

On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:

Tudor Girba-2

Re: moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

Hi,

It's not a problem.

I fixed the problem easily, but I was just raising the issue so that
we can prevent it in the future, perhaps through communication.

Cheers,
Doru

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Benjamin
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> I am sorry :(
>
> But we were preparing Nautilus for Pharo 2.0, and we wanted to reduce the amount of groups to not disturb to much users.
>
> So now there are 'core' and 'release' groups...
>
>
> Sorry again, and thank you for using Nautilus :)
>
> Ben
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Moose build just broke due to the loadRefactorings method being removed from ConfigurationOfNautilus.
>>
>> In general, it would be great to remove as little methods as possible from Configuration classes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>>
>>
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)

Re: moose build broke due to ConfigurationOfNautilus

You are right,

I had totally forgotten than Moose was depending on Nautilus :s

But now, it should not change for a while (the configuration API ^^)

Sorry again,

Ben

On Apr 19, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It's not a problem.
>
> I fixed the problem easily, but I was just raising the issue so that
> we can prevent it in the future, perhaps through communication.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Benjamin
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I am sorry :(
>>
>> But we were preparing Nautilus for Pharo 2.0, and we wanted to reduce the amount of groups to not disturb to much users.
>>
>> So now there are 'core' and 'release' groups...
>>
>>
>> Sorry again, and thank you for using Nautilus :)
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Moose build just broke due to the loadRefactorings method being removed from ConfigurationOfNautilus.
>>>
>>> In general, it would be great to remove as little methods as possible from Configuration classes.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>
>>> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
>